bbqsql_1.1-2_amd64.changes REJECTED
Raphael Hertzog
hertzog at debian.org
Wed Nov 9 20:01:11 UTC 2016
Hi Chris,
On Wed, 09 Nov 2016, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Looks like d/copyright isn't completely up to date, eg.:
I understand a reject when we miss a license or misclassify files
according to their license... but AFAIK we do not require to capture
all copyright holders in debian/copyright.
Am I wrong?
Even upstream stopped doing it, replacing the copyright
notice by a generic one: "Copyright 2012, BBQSQL All rights reserved."
(followed by BSD-3-Clause).
Anyway, Marcos, can you review the copyright file to include all the
copyright notices in the generic "Files: *" entry? (No need to create
sub-set like "bbqsql/menu/*" since all files have the same license)
Thank you!
> bbqsql/__init__.py
> __copyright__ = 'Copyright 2012 Ben Toews (mastahyeti)'
>
> bbqsql/menu/LICENSE.md
> Copyright 2011, The Social-Engineer Toolkit (SET)
>
> (Stopped looking at this point; there might be others)
>
> -- Chris Lamb <lamby at debian.org> Wed, 09 Nov 2016 17:51:09 +0000
>
>
>
> ===
>
> Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
> your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
> concerns.
>
>
>
--
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer
Support Debian LTS: http://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts.html
Learn to master Debian: http://debian-handbook.info/get/
More information about the Pkg-security-team
mailing list