<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<p><br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">El 24/08/16 a las 02:00, Samuel
Henrique escribió:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CABwkT9qnLNMgyc24WFvr7OWGLuqAZ0wDeDk3nKEvR_iZQRqgRg@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_default"
style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif;color:rgb(0,0,0)">Hi team
and Marco<br>
<br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_default"
style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif;color:rgb(0,0,0)">I'm
writing this because i saw some problems in the packaging of
T50 and i would like to help and discuss about how to deal
with then, by the way, the current maintainer of T50 is Marco,
and i would like to ask to co-maintain T50 with you, if that's
ok.<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Yes, of course you can.<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CABwkT9qnLNMgyc24WFvr7OWGLuqAZ0wDeDk3nKEvR_iZQRqgRg@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_default"
style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif;color:rgb(0,0,0)"><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_default"
style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif;color:rgb(0,0,0)">debian/changelog:
I believe somebody forgot to clear the Kali leftovers from the
changelog, is that a problem? If not, anyway, can we clear
then and left only the first entry related to the Debian
release? I beliebe it would be cleaner.<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
I left the credits for every kali packager because i use kali
package as starting point. It is surely unfair not to give them
credits.<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CABwkT9qnLNMgyc24WFvr7OWGLuqAZ0wDeDk3nKEvR_iZQRqgRg@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr"><br>
<div class="gmail_default"
style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif;color:rgb(0,0,0)">pristine-tar:
The first tarball uploaded to this branch was the kali one,
from 5.4.1 (first debian shipped version is 5.6.4), is that a
a problem? Can we reset the pristine-tar branch with 5.6.4?<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
As i already said, i don't see the reason not to give them credits.<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CABwkT9qnLNMgyc24WFvr7OWGLuqAZ0wDeDk3nKEvR_iZQRqgRg@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_default"
style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif;color:rgb(0,0,0)">Please
also note that no upstream tags were made yet, so i believe it
would be less intrusive to reset pristine-tar.<br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_default"
style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif;color:rgb(0,0,0)">If
somebody clones t50 packaging repo from our team and tries gbp
buildpackage, the build will fail because gbp will try to
build the kali version: "dpkg-deb: building package 't50' in
'../t50_5.4.1-rc1-1kali1_amd64.deb'."<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
Perhaps you need to configure gbp to use "debian/master" as the
Debian branch. By default it uses the "master" branch that actually
points to kali version.<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CABwkT9qnLNMgyc24WFvr7OWGLuqAZ0wDeDk3nKEvR_iZQRqgRg@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_default"
style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif;color:rgb(0,0,0)"><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_default"
style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif;color:rgb(0,0,0)">[serious]debian/patches/set-proper-compiler-flags.patch:<br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_default"
style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif;color:rgb(0,0,0)">The
-march=native and -O3 flags were left intact, this is causing
FTBFS on 4 of the main architectures[1] and should be fixed
asap.<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
Yes, it needs to be fixed. march=native is not ok. You can try to
compile (or crosscompile) on other architectures and check of it is
ok without this option. If so, it is trivial to patch upstream
makefile.<br>
<br>
Keep in mind that upstreams states clearly that t50 is only tested
on amd64 and linux.<br>
<br>
That for your help. <br>
<br>
Cheers.<br>
Marcos<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CABwkT9qnLNMgyc24WFvr7OWGLuqAZ0wDeDk3nKEvR_iZQRqgRg@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Pkg-security-team mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Pkg-security-team@lists.alioth.debian.org">Pkg-security-team@lists.alioth.debian.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-security-team">https://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-security-team</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>