thanks, 2.1, backports

[Kristof BAJNOK]

On Monday 11 August 2008 Russ Allbery wrote:
> > The only thing I noticed is that /var/log/shibboleth is being used but
> > not created by any of the packages. Should I file a bug for this?
>
> Yes, please.  We need logrotate rules for it as well.

Hm. As far as I can recall we use upstream defaults for logging that's the 
RollingFileAppender of log4cpp and size-based limited-count rotation. Only 
exception is native log which is sent to syslog, which gets rotated other 
ways. Thus we need no logrotate rules, please correct me if I'm wrong.

> > * Will you provide 2.x backports for Etch?
>
> That was the plan; I personally don't have a lot of time to work on that
> at the moment, though.

We need Etch packages as well, so we'll do. I'm not quite sure whether it 
will be 2.0 or 2.1 - I vote for 2.1 once it is ready.

Kristof
-- 
Kristof BAJNOK
Systems Engineer / Middleware
NIIF / Hungarnet
Hungary