Robert James Clay
jame at rocasa.us
Tue Dec 13 22:05:38 UTC 2011
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 01:54 -0500, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Dec 2011, Robert James Clay wrote:
> > What might be "ready for widespread usage" would be a matter of
> > opinion, but I certainly think that it's at or close to being usable
> > enough to be uploaded to experimental. Thing is, I seem to to be the
> > last one standing in the team & I'm not yet a DD or even DM so I
> > wouldn't be able to do the upload myself as yet.
> Hand me a .dsc of your package to be uploaded and I'll review it.
Thanks! That's what I'll be doing.
> 1.3.x is the branch that you should target IMO because it's this one that
> will likely be the recommended version in 6 months when we freeze.
Oh, I agree and that's what I started on and what led me to start on
the Perl modules that the new v1.3.x versions need.
I've also thought to remove the pre v1.3 entries from
debian/changelog, although I suppose that could simply wait until it
gets cleaned up for the actual version that goes into Debian. (In any
case, it is still present in the separate v1.2 branch in the SVN
More information about the Pkg-sql-ledger-discussion