[Pkg-uml-devel] [2.6.18] shall I upload the changes to provide support to this kernel release

[Stefano Melchior]

On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 11:31:42AM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote:
Dear all,
> > does it make sense to upload the changes in user-mode-linux to provide
> > 2.6.18 kernel in the svn?
> > Yesterday I successfully built the pkg u-m-l-2.6.18.
> 
> yeah. great.
> 2 days ago I wrote: "My plan is to enable amd64 builds with 2.6.18 and I'm
> already working on it." "it" being linux 2.6.18
> I see you like duplicating efforts...
> Bah, upload it. I'll revert my local changes.
I did nothing else than create a new entry in changelog, correct the
control and rules, for the Debian side, a couple of changes in the
config.i386; then build it. Nothing dramatically long.
> 
> > PS: meanwhile I ping the submitters of old 2.4 kernel bugs
> 
> One more example of duplicated efforts (already dealt bugs in March and
> July) as said before.
> 
> I can't understand why do those old bugs need all such attention.
> We have 13 fresh new bugs for rootstrap (4 already pending), most of them
> with patches or suggested solutions, some also need to be discussed with
> submitters or here to implement a proper solution.
> We also have umlrun which you uploaded into the repository 4 months ago
> but never tried to put in shape for a new upload... (I'd say it's starting
> to stink, are you at least interested in it?).

yes of course

> uml-utilites need to add LSB compliance (#385906 + more modifications).
> Better documentation is needed for _all_ packages.

ok, if you agree, please tell me what you would like to take care and you
would like to leave to me. Thus there is no overlapping.
if you prefer this method, it is ok for me.

Cheers

SteX
-- 
Stefano Melchior, GPG key = D52DF829 - <stefano.melchior at openlabs.it>
http://www.openlabs.it/~stex    --     <stefano.melchior at openlabs.it>
http://etinarcadiaego.dyndns.org  --  <ste at etinarcadiaego.dyndns.org>
Skype ID "stefanomelchior"
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 307 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-uml-devel/attachments/20060928/e88bea7f/attachment.pgp