[Pkg-utopia-commits] r1635 - in /packages/unstable/dbus-python/debian: copyright python-dbus-doc.docs

lool at users.alioth.debian.org lool at users.alioth.debian.org
Wed Aug 1 21:42:47 UTC 2007


Author: lool
Date: Wed Aug  1 21:42:47 2007
New Revision: 1635

URL: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-utopia/?sc=1&rev=1635
Log:
* More cleanups.

Modified:
    packages/unstable/dbus-python/debian/copyright
    packages/unstable/dbus-python/debian/python-dbus-doc.docs

Modified: packages/unstable/dbus-python/debian/copyright
URL: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-utopia/packages/unstable/dbus-python/debian/copyright?rev=1635&op=diff
==============================================================================
--- packages/unstable/dbus-python/debian/copyright (original)
+++ packages/unstable/dbus-python/debian/copyright Wed Aug  1 21:42:47 2007
@@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
 This package was debianized by Colin Walters <walters at debian.org> on
 Thu,  6 Mar 2003 18:01:37 -0500
 
-It was downloaded from http://www.freedesktop.org/software/dbus
+It was downloaded from:
+    <http://www.freedesktop.org/software/dbus>
 
 Copyright (C) 2003-2006 Red Hat Inc. <http://www.redhat.com/>
 Copyright (C) 2003 David Zeuthen
@@ -183,36 +184,36 @@
 
 
 -- 
-END OF ACADEMIC FREE LICENSE. The following is intended to describe the essential 
-differences between the Academic Free License (AFL) version 1.0 and other 
+END OF ACADEMIC FREE LICENSE. The following is intended to describe the essential
+differences between the Academic Free License (AFL) version 1.0 and other
 open source licenses:
 
-The Academic Free License is similar to the BSD, MIT, UoI/NCSA and Apache 
-licenses in many respects but it is intended to solve a few problems with 
+The Academic Free License is similar to the BSD, MIT, UoI/NCSA and Apache
+licenses in many respects but it is intended to solve a few problems with
 those licenses.
-    
-* The AFL is written so as to make it clear what software is being 
-licensed (by the inclusion of a statement following the copyright notice 
-in the software). This way, the license functions better than a template 
+
+* The AFL is written so as to make it clear what software is being
+licensed (by the inclusion of a statement following the copyright notice
+in the software). This way, the license functions better than a template
 license. The BSD, MIT and UoI/NCSA licenses apply to unidentified software.
-    
-* The AFL contains a complete copyright grant to the software. The BSD 
+
+* The AFL contains a complete copyright grant to the software. The BSD
 and Apache licenses are vague and incomplete in that respect.
-    
-* The AFL contains a complete patent grant to the software. The BSD, MIT, 
-UoI/NCSA and Apache licenses rely on an implied patent license and contain 
+
+* The AFL contains a complete patent grant to the software. The BSD, MIT,
+UoI/NCSA and Apache licenses rely on an implied patent license and contain
 no explicit patent grant.
-    
-* The AFL makes it clear that no trademark rights are granted to the 
-licensor's trademarks. The Apache license contains such a provision, but the 
+
+* The AFL makes it clear that no trademark rights are granted to the
+licensor's trademarks. The Apache license contains such a provision, but the
 BSD, MIT and UoI/NCSA licenses do not.
-    
-* The AFL includes the warranty by the licensor that it either owns the 
-copyright or that it is distributing the software under a license. None of 
-the other licenses contain that warranty. All other warranties are disclaimed, 
+
+* The AFL includes the warranty by the licensor that it either owns the
+copyright or that it is distributing the software under a license. None of
+the other licenses contain that warranty. All other warranties are disclaimed,
 as is the case for the other licenses.
 
-* The AFL is itself copyrighted (with the right granted to copy and distribute 
-without modification). This ensures that the owner of the copyright to the 
-license will control changes. The Apache license contains a copyright notice, 
-but the BSD, MIT and UoI/NCSA licenses do not. 
+* The AFL is itself copyrighted (with the right granted to copy and distribute
+without modification). This ensures that the owner of the copyright to the
+license will control changes. The Apache license contains a copyright notice,
+but the BSD, MIT and UoI/NCSA licenses do not.

Modified: packages/unstable/dbus-python/debian/python-dbus-doc.docs
URL: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-utopia/packages/unstable/dbus-python/debian/python-dbus-doc.docs?rev=1635&op=diff
==============================================================================
--- packages/unstable/dbus-python/debian/python-dbus-doc.docs (original)
+++ packages/unstable/dbus-python/debian/python-dbus-doc.docs Wed Aug  1 21:42:47 2007
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 build-default/api
-doc/*
-build-default/doc/*
+doc/
+build-default/doc/
 NEWS
 README
 build-default/NEWS.html




More information about the Pkg-utopia-commits mailing list