vdr-plugin-dxr3 ready for upload (?)

[Thomas Schmidt]

Hi

* Nicolas Boullis schrieb am 30.06.06, um 01:33 Uhr:
> I think vdr-plugin-dxr3 is now ready for upload, but I'd be happy if 
> someone could check the changes I did, as this is my first vdr-related 
> package.

I checked it a few minutes ago, and as far as i can see, everything
is ok.

> I also have interrogations about debian/changelog... Shouldn't the 
> changelog entries reference the actual uploader of the package rather 
> than the whole mailing-list? At least, that's what bugs #343072 and 
> #343871 pretend... And why not use dch's standard multi-maintainer 
> format?

Yes, i am aware of these 2 bugs, while i do not really agree with 
Bastian Blanks argumentation, i think that we should discuss this 
issue.

How does dch's standard multi-maintainer format look like? (I wasn't 
aware that there is such a common format now, we started the project 
in April 2004 and at this time there were only a few team-maintained 
packages, and most of them used a different changelog-format.) :)


Regards,
Thomas

-- 
Thomas Schmidt, Debian VDR Team
http://pkg-vdr-dvb.alioth.debian.org/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-vdr-dvb-devel/attachments/20060701/432ad575/attachment.pgp