dpatch

[Stefano Zacchiroli]

On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 01:00:53AM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> I'm not sure it would be a good idea in the current state. at least, not 
> if it's not a warm consensus.

Agreed. I just feel the need to use a more powerful way of handling
patches. I really don't care if it is dpatch or something else, assuming
features are comparable of course. I proposed dpatch just because I'm
used to it.

> I suppose that we can quite easily use cdbs-simplepatchsys with just 
> including the .mk file that create that, I'm not fully sure I must say. 
> When I use cdbs, ``it just works'' and I've never search any further.

If you can have a try and report if it is possible or not then it would
be great!

> > 2) Is there a way in simple-patchsys to edit a patch? What's
> cdbs-edit-patch ? ;)

I could have guessed it indeed :-) Ok, assuming that it can be used
without the whole cdbs I will be happy with cdbs-simplepatchsys as well
for vim packaging ...

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy
zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/
If there's any real truth it's that the entire multidimensional infinity
of the Universe is almost certainly being run by a bunch of maniacs. -!-
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-vim-maintainers/attachments/20051221/dc3c1b7b/attachment.pgp