[vim-tiny] first draft

[Stefano Zacchiroli]

[ Please don't Cc-me, I'm subscribed to this list ]

On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 05:12:00PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> I guess this will make vim less efficient, but quite smaller. if we gain 
> ~100ko, that may be worthwile. if the gain is too small, then don't 
> bother IMHO.

I will first ask Joey or the other base-system responsibles, then if
they bother about the size we can try such a solution.

> okay, seems sensible.
> and as of features, vimdiff *is* needed. really. especially in base. 99% 
> of the time I use vimdiff, it's on config files.

Indeed, that's why I included its support. Unfortunately it brings in
other features which aren't that needed (IMHO) in a tiny version,
especially autocmds which are useless without an installed runtime ...

Cheers.

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy
zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/
If there's any real truth it's that the entire multidimensional infinity
of the Universe is almost certainly being run by a bunch of maniacs. -!-
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-vim-maintainers/attachments/20051101/eabd82f6/attachment.pgp