Bug#337332: vim.list unpacks two wrong links (which update-alternatives then corrects)

Stefano Zacchiroli zack at bononia.it
Sat Nov 5 19:53:39 UTC 2005

On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 06:09:09PM +0000, jeremy at jsbygott.fsnet.co.uk wrote:
> > > Well, /usr/share/man/man1/eview.1.gz on your list looks slightly strange
> > It is just a manpage link
> Sure, but I expected to see a matching link for /usr/bin/eview as well.
> Or (if the binary link is done with update-alternatives) no explicit
> manpage link either (making it as a slave link). This looks untypical,
> hence my comment.

Nice spot: in the reshaping of packages I missed eview/evim, I fixed the
bug in svn.

> Okay, less crazy, have you tested upgrades from old vim?

Yes, but not yet thoroughly. Be sure that I will Cc-you when I will ask
the other pkg-vim maintainers for feedback on the new packaging :-)

Thanks for your feedback.

Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy
zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/
If there's any real truth it's that the entire multidimensional infinity
of the Universe is almost certainly being run by a bunch of maniacs. -!-

More information about the pkg-vim-maintainers mailing list