so long vim maintenance

James Vega jamessan at
Tue Jul 21 15:36:39 UTC 2009

On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 05:22:14PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 11:00:55AM -0400, James Vega wrote:
> > > - finally, it looks like James has remained the only active member of
> > >   the old team in maintaining Vim; maybe it's time to consider sending
> > >   out a "call for help" for Vim maintenance?
> > 
> > It would probably be good to have some other eyes, but I think there is
> > some dead weight in the workload.  I've never really found vim-scripts
> > (and similar packages) to be particularly useful as something shipped in
> > a distribution.
> Uhm, I was actually thinking at the maintenance of Vim itself

I figured, but the maintenance of vim-scripts affects the time that can
be spent on Vim itself.  It's not a big issue though as vim-scripts is
lower priority for me than Vim.

> but hey: it's your call, you're doing a wonderful job basically alone
> these days :)


GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <jamessan at>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <>

More information about the pkg-vim-maintainers mailing list