Bug#342138: package asterisk-dev should contain asterisk.h main header

Caio Begotti caio at ueberalles.net
Mon Dec 5 19:53:00 UTC 2005

On Monday 05 December 2005 17:36, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> Specifically, I know that at least some of the packages that claim to
> require it, actually don't.

I thought that could be my case too, but I've found some problems compilling 
Unicall stuff without it.

> Could you please provide one specific example of a package that needs
> asterisk.h ?

My packages for the Unicall abstraction layer does need it:

More specifically the asterisk-chan-unicall package, if I remember correctly. 
I mean, if it doesn't hurt, why not to include it? The chan_unicall.so 
channel used to be put inside the asterisk/channels/ dir to compile properly 
because the Makefile for channels just knows where to look for this header.

I think it would be even more difficult to merge Unicall code into the 
Asterisk package, right? :-) for I opened this bug.

PS: maybe the "should" word might be changed to "could"...


Caio Begotti (caio1982)

More information about the Pkg-voip-maintainers mailing list