Asterisk: why is there a separate asterisk-config package?

[Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo]

--=-WvWJbDnk2N30B1OIW5iJ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

El lun, 03-01-2005 a las 20:22 +0100, Jerome Warnier escribi=C3=B3:
> I just noticed that the latest package in Sid ships the configuration
> into a separate package.
> Is there any good reason to do that?
> I would rather split the configuration into each package like h323.conf
> into asterisk-h323, and so on...

 I am very puzzled about that. I guess Mark has a nice reason for making
so, but as asterisk directly Depends on asterisk-config, I don't see any
reason. It will only bloat Packages file, with no gain I can see.

 As Mark is currently moving, I don't know if he will be able to answer
soon, but I'd like to hear about this from him.

 Cheers,

--=20
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
   jsogo@debian.org

--=-WvWJbDnk2N30B1OIW5iJ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada
	digitalmente

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBB2sW4S+BYJZB4jhERAl1oAJ9dmDu/kPl0h65/F+VRph5cMmwMwACdEriJ
/QDzrMDbYWy0HrmMmKWs+Tc=
=NrIA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-WvWJbDnk2N30B1OIW5iJ--