Bug#391826: please don't depend on zaptel

[Tzafrir Cohen]

On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 08:37:26PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> Package: zaptel-source
> Version: 1:1.2.9.1.dfsg-1+rmh
> Severity: wishlist
> 
> Please don't make zaptel-modules-xxxx depend on zaptel.  The latter wants
> devices created by loading modules in the former to exist during its postinst,
> but this won't happen the first time you install zaptel-modules, resulting in
> errors (you have to force a re-run zaptel's postinst).

Sorry for the late catch, but:

the package zaptel contains the binary ztcfg, without which none of the
zaptel modules can function (though I have a pending patch to give
default configuration to analog Zaptel channels without the use of
ztcfg).

So at the price of a error in the postinst (which has been supressed to
a warning in later versions of the package) you get correct package
dependencies.

How else can you express here a relation? Zaptel recommends a
zaptel-modules package?

-- 
               Tzafrir Cohen       
icq#16849755                    jabber:tzafrir at jabber.org
+972-50-7952406           mailto:tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com       
http://www.xorcom.com  iax:guest at local.xorcom.com/tzafrir