sofia-sip packaging considerations

George Danchev danchev at spnet.net
Thu Jun 15 20:47:35 UTC 2006


On Thursday 15 June 2006 22:53, Kilian Krause wrote:
[snip]
> well, ok. Surely there's also others and you are right that there's both
> versions exist. As long as it's only helper programs to the library that
> itself don't really have any importance on their own, I'm positive that
> you have a point there. In case they do have a life on their own, I'd
> rather ditch the -bin personally, yet I'll leave it up to you and Kai to
> ultimately decide on that.

I think we will stay with -bin. Well, yes, glibc does not have -bin, but 
sofia-sip has several executables to distribute, not e signle iconv ;-) I 
just saw in a previous message of mine I mentioned it was a single 
executable, but it was a typo of mine.

> > Sorry for the confusion, but the truth is that it is me who is requesting
> > Kai's svn access. My justifications are:
>
> Yes, i did see it wasn't his idea in the first place. No problems. ;)
>
> > * Yes I know we are not after to have every upstream added to pkg-voip
> > repo, but I am requesting his help as Debian package maintainer ;-)
>
> Ok, let's give it a try. I've added his account to alioth. The sync
> should be through tomorrow morning to the svn server (costa). From then
> on the access should be available and fully working. Either of you let
> me know in case you need any other help. ;)

Thanks. Your help is also appreciated, at least as constructive criticism and 
Uploaders: ;-)

-- 
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 <people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu>
fingerprint 1AE7 7C66 0A26 5BFF DF22 5D55 1C57 0C89 0E4B D0AB 



More information about the Pkg-voip-maintainers mailing list