ZapBRI [was: Re: asterisk 1.4]

[Tzafrir Cohen]

On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 06:56:16AM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> Hi
> 
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 11:40:40AM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 10:22:55AM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> > 
> > > > Would people scream if we dropped bristuff?
> > > 
> > > Yes.
> > 
> > What exactly in bristuff do you use?
> > 
> 
> A short summary:
> 
> > * ZapBRI?
> >
> 
> Much required. 
> 
> > * chan_capi?
> 
> Go away
> 
> > 
> > * Fixes to chan_sip and other fixes?
> > 
> > * Extra applications?
> 
> Probably nice to have.
> 
> 
> I was going to dedicate some time to try and see what adaptations are
> needed to the Digium chan_zap and libpri in order to work with the
> bristuffed Zaptel BRI drivers.
> 
> I started with the obvious changes: telling libpri to accept the type
> "bri_cpe" and "bri_net" (though they are now simple aliases to "pri_cpe"
> and "pri_net", repspectively), and setting the proper channel number for
> the D channel.
> 
> Strangely enough, asterisk classic with those two fixes managed to work
> with our quad-bri card. Thus seems too good and simple to be true. 
> 
> So other bristuffers in the crowd: could you please try a test build of
> asterisk-classic with the patch zapbri.dpatch ? It should naturally
> conflict with the real bristuff patch, so disable the setup and build of
> the bristuffed copy.

Anybody here wants to test this?

-- 
Tzafrir Cohen         sip:tzafrir at local.xorcom.com
icq#16849755          iax:tzafrir at local.xorcom.com
+972-50-7952406          jabber:tzafrir at jabber.org
tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com     http://www.xorcom.com