kilian at debian.org
Sat Jul 21 11:17:32 UTC 2007
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 10:43:14AM +0100, Mark Purcell wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jul 2007, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> > > So what's the SONAME then?
> > libpri1: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libpri1.0
> This is only a warning.
> I think we should bump the soname, when we have incompatibility, rather than
> just because lintian tells us it doesn't like it...
> So I'm inclined to revert back and prehaps with 1.6 we bump the soname.
you must not revert it back to libpri1.2 for the obvious reason that
it'll clash namespaces in buildserver.net's dak. Thus, if we want an
asterisk1.2 finally, we need to make sure these two can coexist. In that
case we should rather move forward to a libpri1.4 instead of libpri1...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-voip-maintainers/attachments/20070721/271f1986/attachment.pgp
More information about the Pkg-voip-maintainers