wanpipe packages in Debian

Kilian Krause kilian at debian.org
Mon Nov 19 19:08:40 UTC 2007


Damien,

On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 03:57:46PM +0100, Damien Sandras wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Le lundi 19 novembre 2007 à 11:40 +0200, Tzafrir Cohen a écrit :
> > On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 10:01:57AM +0100, Damien Sandras wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > Le lundi 19 novembre 2007 à 05:57 +0200, Tzafrir Cohen a écrit :
> > > > > 
> > > > > What would you suggest ?
> > > > 
> > > > pkg-voip packages are co-maintained. We will want someone who can answer
> > > > questions for the package (bug reports, verifications of patches, etc.).
> > > > 
> > > > So I would like to ask you if it would be possible for you to remain
> > > > available to answer questions on new packages.
> > > 
> > > I am not an approved Debian packager, and we are doing packages for our
> > > own internal use. I do not want to become a Debian packager because I do
> > > not have enough time for that.
> > > 
> > > However, I am ready to help someone who would want to become an official
> > > debian packager.
> > 
> > Nither am I. If you want a commit access to the pkg-voip repository,
> > you'll just need to open an account on alioth. Account for non
> > debian-developers there have a -guest suffix. 
> > 
> > I don't think, however, that we can have a package there without someone
> > who can answer questions for it.
> 
> Most probably Kilian will read this e-mail. I have very good contacts
> with Kilian. If he agrees to rework what I have done and use it as a
> basis for better packages, I can send him the debian tarball that will
> work with the latest Wanpipe stable release.

actually I have read it over at pkg-voip already. ;)

The question at hand was however not who could package it, but who could
verify the packaging once made. At least if I have grasped the discussion
correctly. Having a sort of packaging maintained shouldn't be much of a
problem. I'm sure Tzafrir will agree here.


> Kilian, are you ready to take over maintainership of that package ? I do
> not want to do it officially.

IMO no problem importing this into Debian if there is someone sending in a
version that's "practically proven working". And once it's reworked and
commited to keep trying/using that version and inform us in case things go
utterly wrong - preferably with a patch. ;-)


> > > 
> > > > How exactly do you create a deb from a new Sangoma tarball? Do you use a
> > > > debian/ subdirectory?
> > > 
> > > Yes.
> > 
> > So I think that the first step would be to take an existing package and
> > use svn-inject to get it into the svn-repo. Can you point me to a copy
> > of the deb (or rather: the .dsc/diff/orig)?
> 
> I will send it directly to Kilian. That way he can clean it before
> committing ;-)

Sure. ;-)

-- 
Best regards,
Kilian
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-voip-maintainers/attachments/20071119/07d606d3/attachment.pgp 


More information about the Pkg-voip-maintainers mailing list