qutecom_2.2~rc3.dfsg0-1_i386.changes REJECTED

[Frank Lichtenheld]

On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 10:59:14AM -0800, Ludovico Cavedon wrote:
> Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > I realise that your debian/copyright is already heavy, but the entry for
> > libpurple is really not sufficient. You might want to take
> > http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/p/pidgin/pidgin_2.5.3-1/libpurple-dev.copyright
> > as a template.
> 
> Do you mean that we should also include all the names listed in
> libpurple-dev.copyright?

There are actually two separate issues:

The first is that some of the files have differing license and copyright
from the majority. You will need to include this information in your
copyright file.

The second is the list of the poeple that make up what you called
the libpurple development team. I would accept that you don't want
to list them all, but a remaining problem is that the files say:
" * Purple is the legal property of its developers, whose names are too
numerous
 * to list here.  Please refer to the COPYRIGHT file distributed with this
  * source distribution."
And the COPYRIGHT file is nowhere to be found. You will need at least
add this COPYRIGHT file to the source package.

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <djpig at debian.org>
www: http://www.djpig.de/