libspandsp vs. libspandsp2

[Kilian Krause]

Bjorn,

> Anyhow I would suggest keeping it just as libspandsp in the debian
> repository.

as laid out in http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-sharedlibs.html
the use of SONAME as part of the package name is recommended and best
practice. Using online libspandsp without SONAME would mean breaking all
subsequent packages with each new API/ABI without having a proper transition
mechanism. The common reference place therefore is libspandsp-dev to rebuild
all reverse depends properly and have them pick up the new change if any.

-- 
Best regards,
Kilian
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-voip-maintainers/attachments/20100128/0b317a71/attachment.pgp>