[pkg-wpa-devel] Recent events

Reinhard Tartler siretart at tauware.de
Tue Jun 13 13:59:39 UTC 2006


On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 09:31:23AM -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 11:38:28PM +1000, Kel Modderman wrote:
> > Well, we have now a pretty cutting edge in the unstable branch 
> > (0..5.3+20060522-2) that breaks support for madwifi.
> > 
> 
> If this isn't what we want, I can upload the 0.4-branch with an
> epoch set so it will supersede the accidental upload of 0.5-branch...
> 
We decided that we want to try the 0.5 branch in unstable for a couple
of reasons. The most important one is that we don't want to release with
madwifi-old support. That branch has been deprecated upstream, and
nobody is really willing to support it any longer. Since there are still
ppl with madwifi-old (mostly because of the fact that madwifi-old is in
debian, and madwifi-ng not yet, but Kel told me that it will be uploaded
today). 

Other reason is that we believe the 0.5 branch should be mature enough
for etch. We haven't heard about big problems on the hostap list, and
the hostap package itself is shipping the 0.5 branch as well.

On the other hand, 0.5 is still regarded as development branch upstream,
and Jouni recommends the 0.3 or 0.4 branch for production use. This
would speak for reverting to 0.4 with an epoch.

Therefore we decided to prepare another upload of wpasupplicant of the 
0.5 branch with updated README.Debian which explains the situation with
advertisment where to get madwifi-ng NOW. Moreover, the new package will
contain both madwifi-ng and madwifi-old headers, with a switch in
debian/rules, defaulting to madwifi-ng. If someone needs madwifi-old
headers, he has basically 2 options: stick with the old package, or
recompile the debian package.

We want to try this for about a week and wait for
comments/flames/bugreports. Then we reconsider if we should revert to
wpasupplicant 0.4 again or stay with the 0.5 branch.

I will have the package prepared in a few hours, I'm currently at work.
If you object to this plan, and prefer to stay with 0.4, then please
contact me. 

Gruesse,
	Reinhard




More information about the Pkg-wpa-devel mailing list