[pkg-wpa-devel] Bug#618719: FTBFS on kfreebsd: ../src/utils/pcsc_funcs.o: undefined reference to symbol 'dlsym@@GLIBC_2.3'

Guillem Jover guillem at debian.org
Sun Apr 10 18:48:49 UTC 2011


Hi!

On Sat, 2011-03-19 at 22:17:38 +1000, Kel Modderman wrote:
> On Friday 18 March 2011 07:46:23 Michael Biebl wrote:
> > Package: wpasupplicant
> > Version: 0.7.3-1
> > Severity: serious

> > wpasupplicant ftbfs on kfree-bsd:
> > 
> > /usr/bin/ld: ../src/utils/pcsc_funcs.o: undefined reference to symbol
> > 'dlsym@@GLIBC_2.3'
> > /usr/bin/ld: note: 'dlsym@@GLIBC_2.3' is defined in DSO //lib/libdl.so.2
> > so try adding it to the linker command line
> > //lib/libdl.so.2: could not read symbols: Invalid operation
> > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> > make[2]: *** [wpa_supplicant] Error 1
> > 
> > Complete build log is at
> > https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=wpasupplicant&arch=kfreebsd-amd64&ver=0.7.3-1&stamp=1299705072&file=log&as=raw
> > 
> > Looks like the build failure is due to 08_pcsc_dynamic.patch

> We could drop the patch or we could update the patch to add '-ldl' to LIBS in
> build system. I'm undecided, and atm extremely burnt out with real life work,
> so am looking for some advice.
> 
> 08_pcsc_dynamic.patch is untested by anyone, not very beautiful looking. Also
> it seems up to me to push to upstream, which I'm not totally confident about.

As I mentioned in bug 612842 [0] (I just resent my reply now which never
arrived), I think this patch in itself is a bad idea, so I'd say just drop
it.

[0] <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=612842#49>

thanks,
guillem





More information about the Pkg-wpa-devel mailing list