[Pkg-xen-devel] Do we have one make more than necessary?
ultrotter at debian.org
Tue Feb 21 07:07:16 UTC 2006
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 07:20:09PM +0100, Ralph Passgang wrote:
> ah, and I removed your comment regarding udev/hotplug, because is wasn't true
> either. upstream just install hotplug or udev (depending what is installed at
> build time) and because I depended on hotplug at build-time I added the make
> udev-install call to also install udev. hotplug support was available all the
> time (for sarge and unstable users that haven't udev installed).
Except that a newer udev could fulfill the hotplug dependency, and then... ;)
Anyway it's nice that we have it sorted out!
> it isn't a problem to have both directories installed, but it helps the user
> to switch from udev to hotplug later on... and there wouldn't be an other way
> without (if I got that right) having two xen packages just because of the udev
> & hotplug thing.
Which it's better if we avoid, I think! :) Well, good! ;)
More information about the Pkg-xen-devel