[Pkg-xen-devel] upgrade report (2.0.6 -> 3.0-testing+pkgxen)

[Julien Danjou]

On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 12:22:39AM +0100, Ralph Passgang wrote:
> But this is "fixable" by running apt-get install -f, but how to deal with this 
> in our packages?

I think we should use a Replace: field.

> (I guess Julien haven't saw that, because on his test he removed the xen 
> package instead of upgrading it).

I don't remember well, but this is probably what happened.

-- 
Julien Danjou
.''`.  Debian Developer
: :' : http://julien.danjou.info
`. `'  http://people.debian.org/~acid
  `-   9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974  C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-xen-devel/attachments/20060303/8132c380/attachment.pgp