[Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#391935: Bug #391935: Re: The answer from Citrix & Xen.org

Josselin Mouette joss at debian.org
Tue Oct 7 08:31:47 UTC 2008


Le mardi 07 octobre 2008 à 12:48 +1100, Ben Finney a écrit :
> Yes, we do need more detail; we need to know that *any* recipient of 
> Debian can redistribute the work to anyone else, modified or 
> unmodified, commercially or otherwise. (Or to know that these actions 
> are not allowed, so that we can remove the package from Debian.)

As for the "modified or unmodified", I think we have already considered
it acceptable to require a name change for significant modifications
made by third-party distributors. For example, though I’m not sure, I
think this is already the case for Apache.

I’ll ask for clarifications about the rest.

Cheers,
-- 
 .''`.
: :' :      We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code.
`. `'       We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to
  `-        our own. Resistance is futile.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-xen-devel/attachments/20081007/af46db65/attachment.pgp 


More information about the Pkg-xen-devel mailing list