From ian.campbell at citrix.com Mon Oct 5 15:37:54 2015 From: ian.campbell at citrix.com (Ian Campbell) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 16:37:54 +0100 Subject: [Pkg-xen-devel] [Xen-devel] Notes from Xen BoF at Debconf15 In-Reply-To: <1441704296.24450.24.camel@citrix.com> References: <1441704296.24450.24.camel@citrix.com> Message-ID: <1444059474.5302.14.camel@citrix.com> On Tue, 2015-09-08 at 10:24 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > grub-xen > ======== > > Needs much better docs. > > ACTION: I agreed to move the text of my blog post somewhere more > obvious. I did this on the last doc day: http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/PvGrub2 Ian. From anbe at debian.org Wed Oct 14 11:56:01 2015 From: anbe at debian.org (Andreas Beckmann) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 13:56:01 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#801768: blktap-dkms: module FTBFS for Linux 4.2: error: too many arguments to function 'mempool_resize' Message-ID: <20151014115601.16391.91782.reportbug@zam581.zam.kfa-juelich.de> Package: blktap-dkms Version: 2.0.93-0.3 Severity: serious Tags: sid stretch User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to build a kernel module for the current sid kernel: Setting up blktap-dkms (2.0.93-0.3) ... Loading new blktap-2.0.93 DKMS files... First Installation: checking all kernels... dpkg: warning: version '*-*' has bad syntax: version number does not start with digit It is likely that 3.16.0-4-amd64 belongs to a chroot's host Building initial module for 4.2.0-1-amd64 Error! Bad return status for module build on kernel: 4.2.0-1-amd64 (x86_64) Consult /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.93/build/make.log for more information. DKMS make.log for blktap-2.0.93 for kernel 4.2.0-1-amd64 (x86_64) Wed Oct 14 11:51:33 UTC 2015 make: Entering directory '/usr/src/linux-headers-4.2.0-1-amd64' Makefile:10: *** mixed implicit and normal rules: deprecated syntax CC [M] /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.93/build/control.o In file included from /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.93/build/linux-blktap.h:66:0, from /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.93/build/blktap.h:33, from /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.93/build/control.c:30: /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.93/build/linux-blktap.h:119:24: warning: variably modified 'pending' at file scope sizeof(((struct blktap_sring *)0)->ring[0]))) ^ /usr/src/linux-headers-4.2.0-1-common/include/xen/interface/io/ring.h:15:59: note: in definition of macro '__RD2' #define __RD2(_x) (((_x) & 0x00000002) ? 0x2 : ((_x) & 0x1)) ^ /usr/src/linux-headers-4.2.0-1-common/include/xen/interface/io/ring.h:17:66: note: in expansion of macro '__RD4' #define __RD8(_x) (((_x) & 0x000000f0) ? __RD4((_x)>>4)<<4 : __RD4(_x)) ^ /usr/src/linux-headers-4.2.0-1-common/include/xen/interface/io/ring.h:18:66: note: in expansion of macro '__RD8' #define __RD16(_x) (((_x) & 0x0000ff00) ? __RD8((_x)>>8)<<8 : __RD8(_x)) ^ /usr/src/linux-headers-4.2.0-1-common/include/xen/interface/io/ring.h:19:66: note: in expansion of macro '__RD16' #define __RD32(_x) (((_x) & 0xffff0000) ? __RD16((_x)>>16)<<16 : __RD16(_x)) ^ /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.93/build/linux-blktap.h:117:8: note: in expansion of macro '__RD32' ((int)__RD32((BLKTAP_PAGE_SIZE - \ ^ /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.93/build/blktap.h:77:41: note: in expansion of macro 'BLKTAP_RING_SIZE' struct blktap_request *pending[BLKTAP_RING_SIZE]; ^ CC [M] /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.93/build/ring.o In file included from /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.93/build/linux-blktap.h:66:0, from /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.93/build/blktap.h:33, from /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.93/build/ring.c:38: /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.93/build/linux-blktap.h:119:24: warning: variably modified 'pending' at file scope sizeof(((struct blktap_sring *)0)->ring[0]))) ^ /usr/src/linux-headers-4.2.0-1-common/include/xen/interface/io/ring.h:15:59: note: in definition of macro '__RD2' #define __RD2(_x) (((_x) & 0x00000002) ? 0x2 : ((_x) & 0x1)) ^ /usr/src/linux-headers-4.2.0-1-common/include/xen/interface/io/ring.h:17:66: note: in expansion of macro '__RD4' #define __RD8(_x) (((_x) & 0x000000f0) ? __RD4((_x)>>4)<<4 : __RD4(_x)) ^ /usr/src/linux-headers-4.2.0-1-common/include/xen/interface/io/ring.h:18:66: note: in expansion of macro '__RD8' #define __RD16(_x) (((_x) & 0x0000ff00) ? __RD8((_x)>>8)<<8 : __RD8(_x)) ^ /usr/src/linux-headers-4.2.0-1-common/include/xen/interface/io/ring.h:19:66: note: in expansion of macro '__RD16' #define __RD32(_x) (((_x) & 0xffff0000) ? __RD16((_x)>>16)<<16 : __RD16(_x)) ^ /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.93/build/linux-blktap.h:117:8: note: in expansion of macro '__RD32' ((int)__RD32((BLKTAP_PAGE_SIZE - \ ^ /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.93/build/blktap.h:77:41: note: in expansion of macro 'BLKTAP_RING_SIZE' struct blktap_request *pending[BLKTAP_RING_SIZE]; ^ CC [M] /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.93/build/device.o In file included from /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.93/build/linux-blktap.h:66:0, from /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.93/build/blktap.h:33, from /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.93/build/device.c:31: /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.93/build/linux-blktap.h:119:24: warning: variably modified 'pending' at file scope sizeof(((struct blktap_sring *)0)->ring[0]))) ^ /usr/src/linux-headers-4.2.0-1-common/include/xen/interface/io/ring.h:15:59: note: in definition of macro '__RD2' #define __RD2(_x) (((_x) & 0x00000002) ? 0x2 : ((_x) & 0x1)) ^ /usr/src/linux-headers-4.2.0-1-common/include/xen/interface/io/ring.h:17:66: note: in expansion of macro '__RD4' #define __RD8(_x) (((_x) & 0x000000f0) ? __RD4((_x)>>4)<<4 : __RD4(_x)) ^ /usr/src/linux-headers-4.2.0-1-common/include/xen/interface/io/ring.h:18:66: note: in expansion of macro '__RD8' #define __RD16(_x) (((_x) & 0x0000ff00) ? __RD8((_x)>>8)<<8 : __RD8(_x)) ^ /usr/src/linux-headers-4.2.0-1-common/include/xen/interface/io/ring.h:19:66: note: in expansion of macro '__RD16' #define __RD32(_x) (((_x) & 0xffff0000) ? __RD16((_x)>>16)<<16 : __RD16(_x)) ^ /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.93/build/linux-blktap.h:117:8: note: in expansion of macro '__RD32' ((int)__RD32((BLKTAP_PAGE_SIZE - \ ^ /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.93/build/blktap.h:77:41: note: in expansion of macro 'BLKTAP_RING_SIZE' struct blktap_request *pending[BLKTAP_RING_SIZE]; ^ /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.93/build/device.c:124:2: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type .release = blktap_device_release, ^ /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.93/build/device.c:124:2: warning: (near initialization for 'blktap_device_file_operations.release') CC [M] /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.93/build/request.o In file included from /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.93/build/linux-blktap.h:66:0, from /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.93/build/blktap.h:33, from /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.93/build/request.c:30: /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.93/build/linux-blktap.h:119:24: warning: variably modified 'pending' at file scope sizeof(((struct blktap_sring *)0)->ring[0]))) ^ /usr/src/linux-headers-4.2.0-1-common/include/xen/interface/io/ring.h:15:59: note: in definition of macro '__RD2' #define __RD2(_x) (((_x) & 0x00000002) ? 0x2 : ((_x) & 0x1)) ^ /usr/src/linux-headers-4.2.0-1-common/include/xen/interface/io/ring.h:17:66: note: in expansion of macro '__RD4' #define __RD8(_x) (((_x) & 0x000000f0) ? __RD4((_x)>>4)<<4 : __RD4(_x)) ^ /usr/src/linux-headers-4.2.0-1-common/include/xen/interface/io/ring.h:18:66: note: in expansion of macro '__RD8' #define __RD16(_x) (((_x) & 0x0000ff00) ? __RD8((_x)>>8)<<8 : __RD8(_x)) ^ /usr/src/linux-headers-4.2.0-1-common/include/xen/interface/io/ring.h:19:66: note: in expansion of macro '__RD16' #define __RD32(_x) (((_x) & 0xffff0000) ? __RD16((_x)>>16)<<16 : __RD16(_x)) ^ /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.93/build/linux-blktap.h:117:8: note: in expansion of macro '__RD32' ((int)__RD32((BLKTAP_PAGE_SIZE - \ ^ /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.93/build/blktap.h:77:41: note: in expansion of macro 'BLKTAP_RING_SIZE' struct blktap_request *pending[BLKTAP_RING_SIZE]; ^ /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.93/build/request.c: In function 'blktap_page_pool_resize': /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.93/build/request.c:202:8: error: too many arguments to function 'mempool_resize' err = mempool_resize(bufs, target, GFP_KERNEL); ^ In file included from /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.93/build/request.c:23:0: /usr/src/linux-headers-4.2.0-1-common/include/linux/mempool.h:32:12: note: declared here extern int mempool_resize(mempool_t *pool, int new_min_nr); ^ /usr/src/linux-headers-4.2.0-1-common/scripts/Makefile.build:263: recipe for target '/var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.93/build/request.o' failed make[3]: *** [/var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.93/build/request.o] Error 1 /usr/src/linux-headers-4.2.0-1-common/Makefile:1403: recipe for target '_module_/var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.93/build' failed make[2]: *** [_module_/var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.93/build] Error 2 Makefile:146: recipe for target 'sub-make' failed make[1]: *** [sub-make] Error 2 Makefile:8: recipe for target 'all' failed make: *** [all] Error 2 make: Leaving directory '/usr/src/linux-headers-4.2.0-1-amd64' Andreas From andy at strugglers.net Tue Oct 20 15:21:21 2015 From: andy at strugglers.net (Andy Smith) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 15:21:21 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#794071: Bug#794071: "xenconsole: Could not open tty `': No such file or directory" during PV guest boot In-Reply-To: <1441373247.26292.500.camel@debian.org> References: <20150730094117.GY4243@bitfolk.com> <1441373247.26292.500.camel@debian.org> Message-ID: <20151020152121.GT4243@bitfolk.com> Hi Ian, On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 02:27:27PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > This sounds a bit like the issue fixed by > http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=commit;h=39ba2989b10b6a1852e253b204eb010f8e7026f1 > > Are you able to run a new Xen (either 4.5.1~rc1-1 from experimental or an > upstream version would do) to confirm? Yes, that fixes the problem for me. I applied the patch to the current Debian stable "xen" source package and it also fixed the issue. Thanks, Andy From ijc at debian.org Wed Oct 21 07:25:11 2015 From: ijc at debian.org (Ian Campbell) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 08:25:11 +0100 Subject: [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#794071: Bug#794071: "xenconsole: Could not open tty `': No such file or directory" during PV guest boot In-Reply-To: <20151020152121.GT4243@bitfolk.com> References: <20150730094117.GY4243@bitfolk.com> <1441373247.26292.500.camel@debian.org> <20151020152121.GT4243@bitfolk.com> Message-ID: <1445412311.32735.16.camel@debian.org> On Tue, 2015-10-20 at 15:21 +0000, Andy Smith wrote: > Hi Ian, > > On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 02:27:27PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > This sounds a bit like the issue fixed by > > http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=commit;h=39ba2989b10b6a1 > 852e253b204eb010f8e7026f1 > > > > Are you able to run a new Xen (either 4.5.1~rc1-1 from experimental > or an > > upstream version would do) to confirm? > > Yes, that fixes the problem for me. Super. Did you run a packaged version from Debian or an upstream version? Can you let me know which so I can tell the BTS about it please. > I applied the patch to the > current Debian stable "xen" source package and it also fixed the > issue. Excellent. By coincidence this was backported to the upstream stable branches yesterday. Ian. From andy at strugglers.net Wed Oct 21 09:19:20 2015 From: andy at strugglers.net (Andy Smith) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 09:19:20 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#794071: Bug#794071: Bug#794071: "xenconsole: Could not open tty `': No such file or directory" during PV guest boot In-Reply-To: <1445412311.32735.16.camel@debian.org> References: <20150730094117.GY4243@bitfolk.com> <1441373247.26292.500.camel@debian.org> <20151020152121.GT4243@bitfolk.com> <1445412311.32735.16.camel@debian.org> Message-ID: <20151021091916.GA4243@bitfolk.com> Hi Ian, On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 08:25:11AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Tue, 2015-10-20 at 15:21 +0000, Andy Smith wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 02:27:27PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > > This sounds a bit like the issue fixed by > > > http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=commit;h=39ba2989b10b6a1 > > 852e253b204eb010f8e7026f1 > > > > > > Are you able to run a new Xen (either 4.5.1~rc1-1 from experimental > > or an > > > upstream version would do) to confirm? > > > > Yes, that fixes the problem for me. > > Super. Did you run a packaged version from Debian or an upstream > version? Can you let me know which so I can tell the BTS about it > please. Sorry, I did not try the Debian package from experimental, I just downloaded and compiled 4.6.0 from http://xenproject.org/downloads/xen-archives/xen-46-series/xen-460.html. I mainly wanted it to work with the current Debian stable package. Cheers, Andy From owner at bugs.debian.org Wed Oct 21 09:27:11 2015 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 09:27:11 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#794071: marked as done ("xenconsole: Could not open tty `': No such file or directory" during PV guest boot) References: <1445419555.9563.64.camel@debian.org> <20150730094117.GY4243@bitfolk.com> Message-ID: Your message dated Wed, 21 Oct 2015 10:25:55 +0100 with message-id <1445419555.9563.64.camel at debian.org> and subject line Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#794071: Bug#794071: "xenconsole: Could not open tty `': No such file or directory" during PV guest boot has caused the Debian Bug report #794071, regarding "xenconsole: Could not open tty `': No such file or directory" during PV guest boot to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 794071: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=794071 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Andy Smith Subject: "xenconsole: Could not open tty `': No such file or directory" during PV guest boot Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 09:41:17 +0000 Size: 5053 URL: -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#794071: Bug#794071: "xenconsole: Could not open tty `': No such file or directory" during PV guest boot Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 10:25:55 +0100 Size: 3467 URL: From adam.wilbraham at g2g3.digital Wed Oct 21 10:03:57 2015 From: adam.wilbraham at g2g3.digital (Adam Wilbraham) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 11:03:57 +0100 Subject: [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#753358: Message-ID: I can confirm that I'm also seeing this issue with DRBD backed block devices. A test dom0 pair that I've just dist upgraded from Wheezy to Jessie is no longer able to boot any domUs via pygrub. As a test I've just pulled pygrub out of xen-tools-4.5 from experimental but I'm still getting the same error in the bootloader.log: ---- Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/xen-4.4/bin/pygrub", line 809, in part_offs = get_partition_offsets(file) File "/usr/lib/xen-4.4/bin/pygrub", line 106, in get_partition_offsets image_type = identify_disk_image(file) File "/usr/lib/xen-4.4/bin/pygrub", line 48, in identify_disk_image fd = os.open(file, os.O_RDONLY) OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'gd-test-domU-disk' --- --- Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/xen-4.5/bin/pygrub", line 845, in part_offs = get_partition_offsets(file) File "/usr/lib/xen-4.5/bin/pygrub", line 115, in get_partition_offsets image_type = identify_disk_image(file) File "/usr/lib/xen-4.5/bin/pygrub", line 58, in identify_disk_image fd = os.open(file, os.O_RDONLY) OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'gd-test-domU-disk' --- -- Adam Wilbraham -- G2G3 Digital Velocity House, 3 Solly Street, Sheffield, S1 4DE +44 (0)114 2212123 http://g2g3.digital/ Part of Capita plc: www.capita.co.uk Registered address: 71 Victoria Street, Westminster, London SW1H 0XA Registered in England and Wales Company No. 02299747 VAT registration No. 618 1841 40 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ba30sscseweps at btconnect.com Thu Oct 22 03:22:07 2015 From: ba30sscseweps at btconnect.com (Lawrence Pentz) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 04:22:07 +0100 Subject: [Pkg-xen-devel] Get back to me Message-ID: Attention I represent an investor from Middle east and is urgently seeking means of expanding business interest abroad such as Real Estate/Construction, oil industry, Banking, Education, Stock speculation, Film Industries, Mining, Transportation, agriculture and those any other Lucrative business. If you have a solid background and idea of making good profit in any business, that is capable of generating 10% annual return on investment via Joint Venture, please write me for possible business co-operation, as we are ready to fund any business that will interest us. Your?s Sincerely Lawrence Pentz -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From noreply at release.debian.org Thu Oct 22 04:39:02 2015 From: noreply at release.debian.org (Debian testing autoremoval watch) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 04:39:02 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-xen-devel] blktap-dkms is marked for autoremoval from testing Message-ID: blktap-dkms 2.0.93-0.3 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2015-11-27 It is affected by these RC bugs: 801768: blktap-dkms: module FTBFS for Linux 4.2: error: too many arguments to function 'mempool_resize' From noreply at release.debian.org Thu Oct 22 04:39:02 2015 From: noreply at release.debian.org (Debian testing autoremoval watch) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 04:39:02 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-xen-devel] blktap is marked for autoremoval from testing Message-ID: blktap 2.0.90-4 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2015-11-27 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 801768: blktap-dkms: module FTBFS for Linux 4.2: error: too many arguments to function 'mempool_resize' From gerbra at gotadsl.co.uk Sat Oct 24 08:35:47 2015 From: gerbra at gotadsl.co.uk (gerbra at gotadsl.co.uk) Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 01:35:47 -0700 Subject: [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#763102: important message Message-ID: <000059bf810f$fd4085fc$7767abf2$@gotadsl.co.uk> Hello! New message, please read gerbra at gotadsl.co.uk -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gerbra at gotadsl.co.uk Sat Oct 24 08:35:47 2015 From: gerbra at gotadsl.co.uk (gerbra at gotadsl.co.uk) Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 01:35:47 -0700 Subject: [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#764912: important message Message-ID: <000059bf810f$fd4085fc$7767abf2$@gotadsl.co.uk> Hello! New message, please read gerbra at gotadsl.co.uk -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gerbra at gotadsl.co.uk Sat Oct 24 08:35:47 2015 From: gerbra at gotadsl.co.uk (gerbra at gotadsl.co.uk) Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 01:35:47 -0700 Subject: [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#770456: important message Message-ID: <000059bf810f$fd4085fc$7767abf2$@gotadsl.co.uk> Hello! New message, please read gerbra at gotadsl.co.uk -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gerbra at gotadsl.co.uk Sat Oct 24 08:35:47 2015 From: gerbra at gotadsl.co.uk (gerbra at gotadsl.co.uk) Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 01:35:47 -0700 Subject: [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#783346: important message Message-ID: <000059bf810f$fd4085fc$7767abf2$@gotadsl.co.uk> Hello! New message, please read gerbra at gotadsl.co.uk -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From solo-debianbugs at goeswhere.com Sat Oct 24 12:31:40 2015 From: solo-debianbugs at goeswhere.com (Chris West (Faux)) Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 13:31:40 +0100 Subject: [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#802870: xen: FTBFS: error: array subscript is above array bounds Message-ID: <20151024123140.GA9899@astoria.goeswhere.com> Source: xen Version: 4.4.1-9+deb8u1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source Tags: sid stretch User: reproducible-builds at lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-CC: reproducible-builds at lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, The package fails to build: symbols.c: In function ?symbols_lookup?: symbols.c:23:61: error: array subscript is above array bounds [-Werror=array-bounds] #define symbols_address(n) (SYMBOLS_ORIGIN + symbols_offsets[n]) ^ symbols.c:128:47: note: in expansion of macro ?symbols_address? while (low && symbols_address(low - 1) == symbols_address(low)) ^ symbols.c:23:61: error: array subscript is above array bounds [-Werror=array-bounds] #define symbols_address(n) (SYMBOLS_ORIGIN + symbols_offsets[n]) ^ symbols.c:136:13: note: in expansion of macro ?symbols_address? if (symbols_address(i) > symbols_address(low)) { ^ cc1: all warnings being treated as errors /xen-4.4.1/debian/build/build-hypervisor_amd64_amd64/xen/Rules.mk:165: recipe for target 'symbols.o' failed make[6]: *** [symbols.o] Error 1 make[6]: Leaving directory '/xen-4.4.1/debian/build/build-hypervisor_amd64_amd64/xen/common' /xen-4.4.1/debian/build/build-hypervisor_amd64_amd64/xen/Rules.mk:153: recipe for target '/xen-4.4.1/debian/build/build-hypervisor_amd64_amd64/xen/common/built_in.o' failed make[5]: *** [/xen-4.4.1/debian/build/build-hypervisor_amd64_amd64/xen/common/built_in.o] Error 2 make[5]: Leaving directory '/xen-4.4.1/debian/build/build-hypervisor_amd64_amd64/xen/arch/x86' Makefile:100: recipe for target '/xen-4.4.1/debian/build/build-hypervisor_amd64_amd64/xen/xen' failed make[4]: *** [/xen-4.4.1/debian/build/build-hypervisor_amd64_amd64/xen/xen] Error 2 make[4]: Leaving directory '/xen-4.4.1/debian/build/build-hypervisor_amd64_amd64/xen' Full build log: https://reproducible.debian.net/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/xen.html -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) From owner at bugs.debian.org Sat Oct 24 14:12:09 2015 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 14:12:09 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-xen-devel] Processed: forcibly merging 793132 802870 References: <1445695824-924-bts-ijc@debian.org> Message-ID: Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 793132 802870 Bug #793132 [src:xen] xen: FTBFS with glibc 2.21 and gcc-5 Bug #802870 [src:xen] xen: FTBFS: error: array subscript is above array bounds Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious' Marked as found in versions xen/4.4.1-9. Added tag(s) fixed-upstream and upstream. Bug #793132 [src:xen] xen: FTBFS with glibc 2.21 and gcc-5 Marked as found in versions xen/4.4.1-9+deb8u1. Added tag(s) sid and stretch. Merged 793132 802870 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 793132: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=793132 802870: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=802870 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems From gabster at lelutin.ca Tue Oct 27 20:27:07 2015 From: gabster at lelutin.ca (Gabriel Filion) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 16:27:07 -0400 Subject: [Pkg-xen-devel] no Xen packages for i386 Message-ID: <562FDE1B.3060004@lelutin.ca> Hi there, I just saw this morning after mistakenly installing the -amd64 packages on a 32bit machine, that the i386 packages had disappeared from debian from jessie onwards. I was wondering about the reason for this disappearance. Is it because upstream cut off support for 32 bit systems? I scratched really fast on the bug reports and couldn't see one that talked about this. -- Gabriel Filion -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 801 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From ijc at debian.org Wed Oct 28 12:31:55 2015 From: ijc at debian.org (Ian Campbell) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 12:31:55 +0000 Subject: [Pkg-xen-devel] no Xen packages for i386 In-Reply-To: <562FDE1B.3060004@lelutin.ca> References: <562FDE1B.3060004@lelutin.ca> Message-ID: <1446035515.10824.6.camel@debian.org> On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 16:27 -0400, Gabriel Filion wrote: > Hi there, > > I just saw this morning after mistakenly installing the -amd64 packages > on a 32bit machine, that the i386 packages had disappeared from debian > from jessie onwards. There is no i386 hypervisor upstream any more (since Xen 4.3) and hence no more xen-hypervisor-*-i386 packages in Debian Jessie onwards. However the i386 tools still exist (e.g. [0]) and can be used with the xen-hypervisor-*-amd64 package[1] (or via the metapackage[2]) with an i386 kernel+userspace in a "32on64" configuration. Ian. [0]?https://packages.debian.org/jessie/i386/xen-utils-4.4/download [1]?https://packages.debian.org/jessie/i386/xen-hypervisor-4.4-amd64/download [2]?https://packages.debian.org/jessie/i386/xen-system-amd64/download From gabster at lelutin.ca Wed Oct 28 15:16:01 2015 From: gabster at lelutin.ca (Gabriel Filion) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 11:16:01 -0400 Subject: [Pkg-xen-devel] no Xen packages for i386 In-Reply-To: <1446035515.10824.6.camel@debian.org> References: <562FDE1B.3060004@lelutin.ca> <1446035515.10824.6.camel@debian.org> Message-ID: <5630E6B1.9050408@lelutin.ca> On 28/10/15 08:31 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 16:27 -0400, Gabriel Filion wrote: >> I just saw this morning after mistakenly installing the -amd64 packages >> on a 32bit machine, that the i386 packages had disappeared from debian >> from jessie onwards. > > There is no i386 hypervisor upstream any more (since Xen 4.3) and hence > no more xen-hypervisor-*-i386 packages in Debian Jessie onwards. I see.. that's what I was expecting > However the i386 tools still exist (e.g. [0]) and can be used with the > xen-hypervisor-*-amd64 package[1] (or via the metapackage[2]) with an > i386 kernel+userspace in a "32on64" configuration. > [0] https://packages.debian.org/jessie/i386/xen-utils-4.4/download > [1] https://packages.debian.org/jessie/i386/xen-hypervisor-4.4-amd64/download > [2] https://packages.debian.org/jessie/i386/xen-system-amd64/download but iiuc 32 bit machines can't run the hypervisor anymore so a 32on64 setup doesn't apply to them. it does however explain to me why the -amd64 version of the hypervisor packages are present on the i386 architecture. thanks a bunch for the feedback! much appreciated -- Gabriel Filion -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 801 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: