[Pkg-xfce-devel] Consensus on Maintainer: and Uploader: fields?

Andrew Lau netsnipe@users.sourceforge.net
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 15:49:24 +1100


--EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi everyone,

Before we go uploading anything, I'd like a consensus on how we will go
about setting the Maintainer/Uploaders fields for our packages. There
are two styles:

Maintainer: Andrew Lau <netsnipe@...>
Uploaders: Debian Xfce Maintainers
	<pkg-xfce-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>, Alexander Schmehl
	<tolimar-guest@...>, Emanuele Rocca <ema@...>

OR:

Maintainer: Debian Xfce Maintainers <pkg-xfce-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Uploaders: Alexander Schmehl <tolimar-guest@...>,
	Andrew Lau <netsnipe@...>. Emanuele Rocca <ema@...>

Choose one and I'll edit the scripts I wrote for gnome-pkg-tools for a
new xfce-pkg-tools package. Don't forget that there's always the PTS for
forwarding bug reports to the list.

Cheers,
Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau

--=20
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
	Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau	<http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~alau/>
 Debian GNU/Linux Maintainer & UNSW Computing Students' Society President
				     -
		  "Nobody expects the Debian Inquisition!
     Our two weapons are fear and surprise...and ruthless efficiency!"
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

--EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFB+cRTmyTAfS6LaL0RAiDGAJ4uIl/FuJdNa+Cks0uSYYCHar0akgCgi9jw
MJmzJcOQaE8iK6tR4SlFNFQ=
=j6gH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU--