[Pkg-xfce-devel] Consensus on Maintainer: and Uploader: fields?
Emanuele Rocca
ema@debian.org
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 10:46:51 +0100
* [ 28-01-05 - 10:26 ] Simon Huggins <huggie@earth.li> wrote:=20
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 03:49:24PM +1100, Andrew Lau wrote:
> > Before we go uploading anything, I'd like a consensus on how we will
> > go about setting the Maintainer/Uploaders fields for our packages.
> > There are two styles:
> =20
> > Maintainer: Andrew Lau <netsnipe@...>
> > Uploaders: Debian Xfce Maintainers
> > <pkg-xfce-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>, Alexander Schmehl
> > <tolimar-guest@...>, Emanuele Rocca <ema@...>
> =20
> > ORe:
> =20
> > Maintainer: Debian Xfce Maintainers <pkg-xfce-devel@lists.alioth.debia=
n.org>
> > Uploaders: Alexander Schmehl <tolimar-guest@...>,
> > Andrew Lau <netsnipe@...>. Emanuele Rocca <ema@...>
> =20
> > Choose one and I'll edit the scripts I wrote for gnome-pkg-tools for a
> > new xfce-pkg-tools package. Don't forget that there's always the PTS f=
or
> > forwarding bug reports to the list.
> =20
> I prefer the second. There's no real reason any one person should have
> more ownership over particular packages than any others.
I prefer the second too.
ciao,=09
ema