[Pkg-xfce-devel] Consensus on Maintainer: and Uploader: fields?

Rudy Godoy rudy@kernel-panik.org
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 15:12:51 -0500


--IuhbYIxU28t+Kd57
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 28/01/2005 at 14:46 Emanuele Rocca wrote...

> >  > Maintainer: Debian Xfce Maintainers <pkg-xfce-devel@lists.alioth.deb=
ian.org>
> >  > Uploaders: Alexander Schmehl <tolimar-guest@...>,
> >  > 	Andrew Lau <netsnipe@...>. Emanuele Rocca <ema@...>
> > =20
> >  > Choose one and I'll edit the scripts I wrote for gnome-pkg-tools for=
 a
> >  > new xfce-pkg-tools package. Don't forget that there's always the PTS=
 for
> >  > forwarding bug reports to the list.
> > =20
> >  I prefer the second.  There's no real reason any one person should have
> >  more ownership over particular packages than any others.
>=20
> I prefer the second too.
>=20

Same here.
-Rudy

--=20
Rudy Godoy | 0x3433BD21 | http://stone-head.org               ,''`.
http://www.apesol.org  -  http://www.debian.org              : :' :
GPG FP: 0D12 8537 607E 2DF5 4EFB  35A7 550F 1A00 3433 BD21   `. `'
                                                               `-

--IuhbYIxU28t+Kd57
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFB+pzCVQ8aADQzvSERApt5AKCzPYmt7eSnPRdKoRCjSSldMvFLYgCdHxX6
kkgZE9mzDQYTJlJKPLefoGA=
=fsh9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--IuhbYIxU28t+Kd57--