[Pkg-xfce-devel] Consensus on Maintainer: and Uploader: fields?
Rudy Godoy
rudy@kernel-panik.org
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 15:12:51 -0500
--IuhbYIxU28t+Kd57
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 28/01/2005 at 14:46 Emanuele Rocca wrote...
> > > Maintainer: Debian Xfce Maintainers <pkg-xfce-devel@lists.alioth.deb=
ian.org>
> > > Uploaders: Alexander Schmehl <tolimar-guest@...>,
> > > Andrew Lau <netsnipe@...>. Emanuele Rocca <ema@...>
> > =20
> > > Choose one and I'll edit the scripts I wrote for gnome-pkg-tools for=
a
> > > new xfce-pkg-tools package. Don't forget that there's always the PTS=
for
> > > forwarding bug reports to the list.
> > =20
> > I prefer the second. There's no real reason any one person should have
> > more ownership over particular packages than any others.
>=20
> I prefer the second too.
>=20
Same here.
-Rudy
--=20
Rudy Godoy | 0x3433BD21 | http://stone-head.org ,''`.
http://www.apesol.org - http://www.debian.org : :' :
GPG FP: 0D12 8537 607E 2DF5 4EFB 35A7 550F 1A00 3433 BD21 `. `'
`-
--IuhbYIxU28t+Kd57
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFB+pzCVQ8aADQzvSERApt5AKCzPYmt7eSnPRdKoRCjSSldMvFLYgCdHxX6
kkgZE9mzDQYTJlJKPLefoGA=
=fsh9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--IuhbYIxU28t+Kd57--