<div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><br>Yes, but developer time is more precious thus saving it is good. Only<br>using it for many changes is more efficient.
</blockquote><div><br>I wouldn't have proposed what I did unless I had a good motivation<br>And in this case was that indeed I think more developer time was wasted in the form of<br>irc chat, utnubu consulting, bug reports and the afferent threads, etc that it would have
<br>been the case if some of the current svn was uploaded earlier.<br></div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">> Maybe some set of rules should be worked out: upload if there's a new
<br>> revision and at least week has passed or something like that. That<br>> would make the buildd be subjected to no more than number of xfce<br>> packages per week. Plus other urgent stuff.<br><br>New upstream I agree is sensible but the rest depends.
<br><br></blockquote></div><br>What if some upstreams are dead effectively(battery-plugin)? We should still go ahead and upload our<br>fixes.<br><br><br>Jani