Bug#454872: FTBFS with GCC 4.3: missing #includes

Alexander Schmehl alexander at schmehl.info
Sun Apr 6 02:04:09 UTC 2008


tags 454872 -patch
thanks


* Cyril Brulebois <cyril.brulebois at enst-bretagne.fr> [080304 04:58]:

> I know it's fixed-upstream, but anyway, here's a patch against the
> current revision, because of the RG/RC-iness of this bug.

While preparing an NMU based upon your patch, I found that it didn't
work completly.

After several lines of stuff like:
- _ZNSt8_Rb_treeIPKcSt4pairIKS1_PKN5Spiff20SpiffExtensionReaderEESt10_Select1stIS8_ENS4_7Toolbox18SpiffStringCompareESaIS8_EE9_M_insertEPSt18_Rb_tree_node_base0
+#MISSING: 0.8.2-2.1# _ZNSt8_Rb_treeIPKcSt4pairIKS1_PKN5Spiff20SpiffExtensionReaderEESt10_Select1stIS8_ENS4_7Toolbox18SpiffStringCompareESaIS8_EE9_M_insertEPSt0
+ _ZNSt8_Rb_treeIPKcSt4pairIKS1_PcESt10_Select1stIS5_EN5Spiff7Toolbox18SpiffStringCompareESaIS5_EE10_M_insert_EPKSt18_Rb_tree_node_baseSF_RKS5_ at Base 0.8.2-2.1
  _ZNSt8_Rb_treeIPKcSt4pairIKS1_PcESt10_Select1stIS5_EN5Spiff7Toolbox18SpiffStringCompareESaIS5_EE16_M_insert_uniqueERKS5_ at Base 0.8.0
- _ZNSt8_Rb_treeIPKcSt4pairIKS1_PcESt10_Select1stIS5_EN5Spiff7Toolbox18SpiffStringCompareESaIS5_EE4findERS3_ at Base 0.8.0
+#MISSING: 0.8.2-2.1# _ZNSt8_Rb_treeIPKcSt4pairIKS1_PcESt10_Select1stIS5_EN5Spiff7Toolbox18SpiffStringCompareESaIS5_EE4findERS3_ at Base 0.8.0
  _ZNSt8_Rb_treeIPKcSt4pairIKS1_PcESt10_Select1stIS5_EN5Spiff7Toolbox18SpiffStringCompareESaIS5_EE8_M_eraseEPSt13_Rb_tree_nodeIS5_E at Base 0.8.0
- _ZNSt8_Rb_treeIPKcSt4pairIKS1_PcESt10_Select1stIS5_EN5Spiff7Toolbox18SpiffStringCompareESaIS5_EE9_M_insertEPSt18_Rb_tree_node_baseSE_RKS5_ at Base 0.8.0
+#MISSING: 0.8.2-2.1# _ZNSt8_Rb_treeIPKcSt4pairIKS1_PcESt10_Select1stIS5_EN5Spiff7Toolbox18SpiffStringCompareESaIS5_EE9_M_insertEPSt18_Rb_tree_node_baseSE_RKS50
  _ZTI20SpiffCReaderCallback at Base 0.8.0
  _ZTIN5Spiff10SpiffPropsE at Base 0.8.0
  _ZTIN5Spiff10SpiffTrackE at Base 0.8.0

I get the following error:

dh_makeshlibs: command returned error code 256

Perhaps the new upstream version should be packaged?


Yours sincerely,
  Alexander


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-xiph-maint/attachments/20080406/1ca8b8b8/attachment.pgp 


More information about the pkg-xiph-maint mailing list