[Pkg-zope-developers] Re: Bug#158554: Separate ZODB package status?

Fabio Tranchitella kobold at debian.org
Wed Aug 10 18:41:01 UTC 2005

Il giorno mer, 10/08/2005 alle 20.28 +0200, martin f krafft ha scritto:
> also sprach Derrick Hudson <dman at dman13.dyndns.org> [2005.08.10.2009 +0200]:
> > FYI they already do:  http://www.zope.org/Products/ZODB3.4
> Cool! I wonder whether we couldn't modularise the Zope package with
> that. What do pkg-zope people think? Any chance to make upstream do
> that?

Really cool, I've just downloaded the tarball and I'll start hacking it
this night. I'm curious about how zodb works and how I could use it as a
standalone product.

Why do you think modularize zope packages using different ZoDB is a good
idea? In my opinion it would produce a lot of problems about
compatibilities between zope servers and stand-alone ZoDB packages.
I don't want to see zodb-3.3.x, zodb-3.4.0 and zodb-3.4.1 packages only
because zope 2.7.x, 2.8.0 and zope 2.8.1 depends on different zodb

I think one zodb package would be enough.

Fabio Tranchitella <kobold at debian.org>                        .''`.
Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.            : :'  :
                                                             `. `'`
   http://people.debian.org/~kobold/                           `-
1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-zope-developers/attachments/20050810/57f8039c/attachment.pgp

More information about the Pkg-zope-developers mailing list