[Pkg-zope-developers] Re: Bug#158554: Separate ZODB package status?

[Fabio Tranchitella]

Il giorno gio, 11/08/2005 alle 00.25 +0200, Brian Sutherland ha scritto:
> I was thinking about the simplest way to do this, my first idea would be
> to split the zope3-lib package into zope3-lib and zodb-lib. zope3-lib
> already puts zodb on the python path so the changes would be quite
> minimal and we would avoid any version incompatibilities beween zodb and
> zope3 automatically.

I would prefer to have an indipendent zodb package, instead of using a
zope-related one. All in all, zodb is a standalone product and there is
no reason to package it from zope sources: it has its own upstream
source tarball and its own version number, let's use them.

-- 
Fabio Tranchitella <kobold at debian.org>                        .''`.
Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.            : :'  :
                                                             `. `'`
   http://people.debian.org/~kobold/                           `-
_____________________________________________________________________
1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-zope-developers/attachments/20050811/8c806d2f/attachment.pgp