[Pkg-zope-developers] Re: zope-common and dh-zope, new packages

[martin f krafft]

--0F1p//8PRICkK4MW
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

also sprach Fabio Tranchitella <kobold@kobold.it> [2005.03.29.1505 +0200]:
> > > I'm preparing a reduced *sarge-specific* zope-common.
> > What's the benefit?
>=20
> Don't ship dzhandle, we won't use (so we don't need) it within sarge.

Sure, but why do we need zope-common then?

Anyway, I think we should stop discussing and upload to
experimental. Then we can prepare an update of the stuff in testing
in such a way that it stays backwards-compatible with the current
packages.

Can you please prepare a list of all packages you think we should
take over, and briefly state whether take-over would be friendly
(the maintainer is okay with it), or unknown (the maintainer does
not respond)?

Also, maybe it would make sense to put together a brief list of
planned changes for each package... maybe on a Wiki? Can we set up
a Wiki on Alioth? Does anyone have experience with that?

--=20
 .''`.     martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org>
: :'  :    proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
=20
Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
=20
"time flies like an arrow. fruit flies like a banana."
                                                       -- groucho marx

--0F1p//8PRICkK4MW
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCSXjQIgvIgzMMSnURAqgGAJ98oxZWRsWE4oZxkyC6zWLgYhvVXwCgqlMa
47NOuPoLAzh+xuqKAp/uYdM=
=BKSk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--0F1p//8PRICkK4MW--