[Quantian-general] Preparing 0.4.9.6
Mon, 29 Mar 2004 13:48:30 +0000 (GMT)
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> Ok. lam-runtime was an oversight, should be in next time. As we may not want
> to force lam onto everybody, we may not want to automatically start lamboot.
> What do you think?
> We're trying to automate private/public key generation at boottime (for
> openMosix and friends) , but there are a some issues. Stay tuned.
If you try to run mpirun.lam and lamboot is not working, you get a
very clear message about it. On the contrary, if you try to run mpirun.mpich,
you have to give your password (for your own machine, where you are
already logged) and it is not clear why (unless you read
the FAQ). So, ok for lamboot NOT starting at boot and trying to automate
private/public key generation at bottime.