[Reportbug-maint] Fwd: reportbug name usage

[Sandro Tosi]

Hello Gary,
I don't have problems me either about the lib name, what I can only
suggest is to clearly state in the description that "libreportbug" is
in no way related with "reportbug", but it's a lib to enable bug
reporting in apps.

Regards,
Sandro

On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 05:39, Chris Lawrence <lawrencc at debian.org> wrote:
> FYI.  I told Gary I didn't personally have a problem with his request,
> but that I'd pass it along to the maintainers group.
>
>
> Chris
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Gary Kramlich <grim at reaperworld.com>
> Date: Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 9:35 PM
> Subject: reportbug name usage
> To: lawrencc at debian.org
>
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> I hope I'm not intruding, but I'm in the scoping phase of a new library
> that I plan to integrate the action of reporting bugs in applications in
> an abstract way.  The idea is very similar to reportbug, but the idea is
> to do it in an distribution/OS abstracted way.
>
> Anyways, the real purpose of this email is about the name reportbug.
> Right now, I'd leaning towards "libreportbug", but I wanted to get your
> approval before I go ahead and use it.
>
> If you say no, I understand.  The last thing I want to do is add
> potential confusion on which package does what.  And to me a name is a
> name, libreportbug just seems to describe it very well.
>
> Anyways, thanks for your time,
>
> --
> Gary Kramlich <grim at reaperworld.com>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Reportbug-maint mailing list
> Reportbug-maint at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/reportbug-maint
>
>



-- 
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, Morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi