[Reportbug-maint] Bug#373293: closed by "Sandro Tosi" <matrixhasu at gmail.com> (Your version of <package> (<version>) is newer than that in Debian - fixed)

[Thomas Weber]

Hi Sandro, 

Am Montag, den 30.06.2008, 15:36 +0000 schrieb Debian Bug Tracking
System:
> E-Mail-Nachricht-Anlage
> > -------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --------
> > Von: Sandro Tosi <matrixhasu at gmail.com>
> > An: 386666-done at bugs.debian.org, 362698-done at bugs.debian.org,
> > 373293-done at bugs.debian.org
> > Betreff: Your version of <package> (<version>) is newer than that in
> > Debian - fixed
> > Datum: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 17:33:50 +0200
> > 
> > Version: 3.39-0.1
> > 
> > As reported in changelog for that version:
> > 
> >   * Indicate that in mode > standard incoming and NEW are also checked with
> >     --check-available (Closes: #450523, #447380)
> > 
> > So, this bug is fixed, as long as you use "mode > standard"; infact:

Eh, no. For one, I used the standard mode, as indicated by reportbug in
the bug report. 

Second, I didn't download the emacs package from neither NEW nor
incoming, but indeed from a normal Debian mirror.

> > Your version (1.7.5) of debtags appears to be out of date.
> > The following newer release(s) are available in the Debian archive:
> >   incoming: 1.7.6
> > Do you still want to file a report [y|N|q|?]?
> > reportbug: exiting due to user interrupt.
> > $
> > 
> > and debtags was uploaded minutes ago.

My bugreport is the other way round: reportbug claims I have a newer
version than the one available in Debian. In your example, reportbug
tells you that there is a newer version available in Debian.

According to the changelog[1], the package version in the bug report was
uploaded on 09 Jun 2006, my bugreport was 5 days later.

[1] I use Romain's emacs-snapshots packages from his homepage and the
full changelog starting 2004 is included.

	Thomas