[Reproducible-builds] On expiring packages and issues

[Jérémy Bobbio]

Santiago Vila:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 01:40:22PM +0200, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> > I would say that it's better to keep any issue which other free software
> > projects might bump into.
> 
> Agreed.
> 
> > I know it's far from a clear guideline. In any
> > cases, we have the history, as Holger said.
> 
> I'd like to avoid having to recover an old issue from git history, if
> possible.
> 
> So I propose this simple guideline to remove issues: Do it only when
> they were due to bugs in our CI.

I think it's sound to also remove issues due to Debian-specific
toolchain once it has been fixed. I don't think there's much value in
keeping tabs on something like ordering problems in debhelper the
required `sort` has been added.

-- 
Lunar                                .''`. 
lunar at debian.org                    : :Ⓐ  :  # apt-get install anarchism
                                    `. `'` 
                                      `-   
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/reproducible-builds/attachments/20151016/4ee2fc36/attachment.sig>