[Reproducible-builds] reproducible builds + PIE + bindnow for Stretch?(Re: Time to reevaluate the cost of -fPIC?)

Holger Levsen holger at layer-acht.org
Mon May 16 10:11:31 UTC 2016


On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 08:13:19PM +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> I think the next step could be an archive rebuild with the changed defaults

I assume you are talking about a test rebuild here… first, as a next
step.

I'm replying here now about the "real rebuilds" coming later:

reproducible builds will also need an archive rebuild (or 24k source
uploads) once a dpkg with our features is in the archive.

So my point here is mostly: please coordinate those two archive
rebuilds. It would be awesome to have both PIE and reproducible builds
in stretch for as many packages as possible.


-- 
cheers,
	Holger
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/reproducible-builds/attachments/20160516/cffda4b1/attachment.sig>


More information about the Reproducible-builds mailing list