[sane-devel] Current TODO list

Henning Meier-Geinitz henning@meier-geinitz.de
Sun, 20 Jan 2002 13:26:54 +0100


Hi,

On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 12:47:45PM +0100, abel deuring wrote:
> Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> 
> > sanei
> > -----
> >   * sanei_scsi: Check return values of req_wait and cmd in case of
> >     SCSI DEVICE BUSY. Better specification of the behaviour of sanei_scsi
> >     functions (e.g. return values, timeout 10 min versus 1 min)?
> 
> what do you mean with "check return values"? 

I think I was referring to your mails on sane-devel on 2001-10-28: "Re:
[sane-devel] linux 2.4 scsi problems, sane 1.0.5". If I summarized it badly or
it's outdated just say it.
 
> Regarding the timeout, I think we should switch a common value of 1
> minute. I assume that most development is done under Linux, where we
> have a 10 minute time out at present; the 1 minute timeout for other
> operating systems might cause unexpected errors if a backend for a
> really slow scanner is developed under Linux.

1 minute should be ok even for the slow Mustek scanners :-)

Bye,
  Henning