[sane-devel] epson 1250u vs 45-TEST5

Gene Heskett gene_heskett@iolinc.net
Sun, 5 Jan 2003 14:48:18 -0500


Hi everybody;

I just rebuilt the sane-backends-1.0.9 with the plustek-45-TEST5 
patches, something I hadn't done in several versions now.

On deleting config.cache and config.status & re-running ./configure, 
configure made me aware that there was sane stuff in /usr, but that 
the instant install was going to be /usr/local.  So I went thru 
/usr/bin and /usr/lib, getting rid of anything that looked as if it 
was sane related.  Then I redid the whole confiyre thing from 
scratch, made it and installed it.

On launching xsane from desktop icon, I was pleasantly surprised to 
see it list my hauppage wintv (bt 848) card as a source driver 
option, but didn't try it.  And I didn't try the epson backend 
either, but selected the plustek for this test.  During this 
scanning for devices phase, it did turn on the lamp for about 100 
milliseconds.

Selecting the plutek backend I clicked ok and all the windows 
associated with the plustek backend opened up normally.
As there was something already on the glass, I hit the acquire 
preview button.  It turned on the lamp, waited about 1:30, then 
moved it forward about 1 mm, then back about 2mm and shut it off 
for half a second somewhere in the middle of that sequence.  Then 
it started the preview scan at a fairly rapid scan rate, and very 
very quietly, a major improvement.

When it reached the end of the forward scan, it cleared the preview 
screen for about 1/2 second, and then the whole thing went 
instantly away, leaveing the scanner in the rewind mode, which it 
did very quietly, stopping when it reached the home position long 
after everything from xsane was cleared from the screen leaving me 
watching the wallpaper.

Trying out the bt848 option, it captured a blank, 18% grey screen. 
(theres no antenna feed to the card at the moment so it should have 
been snow, but what do I know, I'm just a broadcast tv engineer).

Then trying the epson gt-7200 (or was the 6800?) it still worked at 
least in preview mode.

I tried to run xsane from the shell and had to go delete even more 
of the older xsane-0.84 install, sigh & damn redhats 
install/upgrade scripts, I done that twice already.

However, just for grins & in case its fussy, I'll go make xsane and 
sane-front-ends-1.0.9 fresh again now that this version of the 
backends is in place.

My /var/log/messages file is growing with lots of messages that 
read:Jan  5 14:37:24 coyote kernel: scanner.c: open_scanner(1): 
Unable to access minor data

and 
Jan  5 14:37:23 coyote kernel: scanner.c: open_scanner(15): Unable 
to access minor data
Jan  5 14:37:24 coyote kernel: Device not ready.  Make sure there is 
a disc in the drive.
Jan  5 14:37:24 coyote kernel: VFS: busy inodes on changed media.
Jan  5 14:37:24 coyote kernel: sda : READ CAPACITY failed.
Jan  5 14:37:24 coyote kernel: sda : status = 1, message = 00, host 
= 0, driver = 08
Jan  5 14:37:24 coyote kernel: Info fld=0xa00 (nonstd), Current 
sd00:00: sns = 70  2
Jan  5 14:37:24 coyote kernel: Raw sense data:0x70 0x00 0x02 0x00 
0x00 0x0a 0x00 0x00
Jan  5 14:37:24 coyote kernel: sda : block size assumed to be 512 
bytes, disk size 1GB.
Jan  5 14:37:24 coyote kernel:  sda: I/O error: dev 08:00, sector 0
Jan  5 14:37:24 coyote kernel:  I/O error: dev 08:00, sector 0
Jan  5 14:37:24 coyote kernel:  unable to read partition table
Jan  5 14:37:24 coyote kernel: scanner.c: open_scanner(1): Unable to 
access minor data


And any attempt to scan for real dies in about 3" of forward motion 
at 300 dpi, plus the motor complains a wee bit as its getting 
started, like its hitting the backstop maybe.  It doesn't do this 
in preview mode.

Also, in the FWIW category, the histograms do not display Olivers 
logo when in the epson gt-7200 driver mode.

So whats next kind folks?  What did *I* screw up this time?

-- 
Cheers, Gene
AMD K6-III@500mhz 320M
Athlon1600XP@1400mhz  512M
99.21% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly