[sane-devel] Problems with scsi filmscanner canon2700

Sat, 25 Sep 2004 15:09:03 +0900

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

--Boundary_(ID_M+P6SitMRS4avM54ZzVn4A)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT

Dear Thomas, Ulrich Deiters and Abel Deuring,
Thank you very much for your useful information, Thomas.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Thomas Loescher" <mailgrab@gmx.de>
To: <sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 6:08 AM
Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Problems with scsi filmscanner canon2700

> I started with testing on version 1.0.10. The backend worked!
> then I made a step forward to version 1.0.11. This backend worked, too!
> For verifying that there is nothing making me crazy, also I tested version
1.0.12, wich didn't worked in earlier tests.
> But version 1.0.12 still didn't worked.
> So I think we can start with version 1.0.11 as the last working version
(What I have currently installed)

That's right! I did add no wrong change to version1.0.8.
Ok, good!
In fact, I have made version 1.0.12 adding some new codes to version 1.0.11
for canoscanFB1200S.
Perhaps, then I have added some wrong change to the codes for 2700F....I'm
very sorry, 2700F user.

> I'm very motivated to help you finding out, how to fix the current
version.
> How can I help you? what debug/strace/whatever output you would like to
get from me?

Yes, would you send me the debug files of version 1.0.11 and 1.0.12 ?
And I do not have a canoscanFB1200S now, though when I had modified version
1.0.11 for FB1200S, I could use it.
So, I would like to ask for the canoscanFB1200S user's test too.

Well, Ulrich Deiters and Abel Deuring, would you like to help me to seek the
wrong codes which are in version 1.0.12 but not in version 1.0.11 ?

So, Thomas, how trouble for 2700F the version 1.0.12 have ?
Would you give me more specific explanation about the trouble of version
1.0.12 ?
And Could you use Xsane0.91 with version 1.0.11 by 2700F ?

 Best regards

mitsuru okaniwa

--Boundary_(ID_M+P6SitMRS4avM54ZzVn4A)
Content-type: text/html; charset=iso-2022-jp
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-2022-jp">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1458" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV>Dear Thomas, Ulrich Deiters 
and Abel Deuring, Thank you very much for your useful information, 
Thomas. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Thomas Loescher" 
&lt;<A href="mailto:mailgrab@gmx.de">mailgrab@gmx.de</A>&gt; To: &lt;<A 
href="mailto:sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org">sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org</A>&gt; Sent: 
Friday, September 24, 2004 6:08 AM Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Problems with 
scsi filmscanner canon2700 &gt; I started with testing on version 1.0.10. 
The backend worked! &gt; then I made a step forward to version 1.0.11. This 
backend worked, too! &gt; For verifying that there is nothing making me 
crazy, also I tested version 1.0.12, wich didn't worked in earlier 
tests. &gt; But version 1.0.12 still didn't worked. &gt; So I think we can 
start with version 1.0.11 as the last working version (What I have currently 
installed) That's right! I did add no wrong change to 
version1.0.8. Ok, good! In fact, I have made version 1.0.12 adding some 
new codes to version 1.0.11 for canoscanFB1200S. Perhaps, then I have 
added some wrong change to the codes for 2700F....I'm very sorry, 2700F 
user. &gt; I'm very motivated to help you finding out, how to fix the 
current version. &gt; How can I help you? what debug/strace/whatever 
output you would like to get from me? Yes, would you send me the debug 
files of version 1.0.11 and 1.0.12 ? And I do not have a canoscanFB1200S now, 
though when I had modified version 1.0.11 for FB1200S, I could use it. So, 
I would like to ask for the canoscanFB1200S user's test too. Well, Ulrich 
Deiters and Abel Deuring, would you like to help me to seek the wrong codes 
which are in version 1.0.12 but not in version 1.0.11 ? So, Thomas, how 
trouble for 2700F the version 1.0.12 have ? Would you give me more specific 
explanation about the trouble of version 1.0.12 ? And Could you use 
Xsane0.91 with version 1.0.11 by 2700F ? &nbsp;Best 
regards mitsuru okaniwa </DIV></BODY></HTML>

--Boundary_(ID_M+P6SitMRS4avM54ZzVn4A)--