[sane-devel] Canon LiDE 60: Semi-success report

[Reinhard Mayr aka Czerwinski]

Hi again,

sorry, I did not realize that there is a difference between current CVS  
and experimental.

These are my results with the current experimental code:

Lineart:
75: ok
150: ok
300: ok
600: ok
1200: ok
2400: ok

gray/8bit:
75: ok
150: ok
300: ok
600: ok
1200: ok
2400: Error during read: error during device I/O. I can avoid this by  
enforcing backtracking through system load (e.g. by task switching)

gray/16bit:
75: ok
150: ok
300: ok
600: backtracking. horizontal lines
1200: backtracking. Error during read: error during device I/O
2400: backtracking. horizontal lines - picture is unusable

color/8bit:
Segmentation fault at any resolution

color/16bit:
600: Failed to start scanner: invalid argument
other resolutions: segmentation fault


Best,

Cz.


On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 16:52:56 +0100, Henning Meier-Geinitz  
<henning at meier-geinitz.de> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 02:19:36PM +0100, Reinhard Mayr aka Czerwinski  
> wrote:
>> I did some tests with the LiDE 60 and the current CVS backend
>> (20051204-14:10). These are my results:
>
> Use the backend from experimental CVS. As mentioned in my success
> report, that one works much better, at least for me.
>
>> Gray/16 bit
>> 75: ok
>> 150: ok
>> 300: ok
>> 600: stepping forth & back, horizontal lines
>> 1200: stepping forth & back, horizontal lines, freezes after 2.5 cm
>> 2400: stepping forth & back, horizontal lines
>
> The backtracking seems to be normal, at least it happens here also.
> Looks like the scanner delivers data faster than either its USB part
> or the computer can handle.
>
> Bye,
>   Henning
>



-- 
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/