[sane-devel] Going forwared with SANE

Alessandro Zummo azummo-lists at towertech.it
Mon Dec 17 18:50:20 UTC 2007


On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 19:44:31 +0100
Julien BLACHE <jb at jblache.org> wrote:

> >  we could, but every answer will be different or, at least, slightly
> >  different.
> 
> Then, we can't answer it. As long as what you wrote will hold, then it
> means we can't answer that (rather crucial) question.
> 
> >  if we answer, who will take the burden of actually choice 
> >  a single answer?
> 
> Everybody interested in SANE will take the burden of developing it
> further. But that requires a rough form of consensus first.

 Yes, and given we have not reached it in years, I'm not so
 confident that we would be able to do it now.

 I think we have a split situation in which each "side" has
 probably some 50% . And I don't really have an answer on
 how to solve that.


-- 

 Best regards,

 Alessandro Zummo,
  Tower Technologies - Torino, Italy

  http://www.towertech.it




More information about the sane-devel mailing list