[sane-devel] SANE frozen in amber ?

Alessandro Zummo azummo-lists at towertech.it
Mon Jun 15 19:10:15 UTC 2009

On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 20:55:23 +0200
Julien BLACHE <jb at jblache.org> wrote:

> >  my vote is for the 4th option.  
> And here I was, thinking you people wanted to see some progress made.
> You do realize that option 4 basically guarantees that pretty much
> nothing major will happen, will drag on for years and basically be
> a pain to manage because there will be lot of small changes all the
> time?

 as long as the api change is documented and not mandatory
 it's perfectly viable.

 You know, I made a test bed with sane-evolution 
 for this and worked flawlessy, even retaining frontend


 Best regards,

 Alessandro Zummo,
  Tower Technologies - Torino, Italy


More information about the sane-devel mailing list