[sane-devel] SANE frozen in amber ?
azummo-lists at towertech.it
Mon Jun 15 19:10:15 UTC 2009
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 20:55:23 +0200
Julien BLACHE <jb at jblache.org> wrote:
> > my vote is for the 4th option.
> And here I was, thinking you people wanted to see some progress made.
> You do realize that option 4 basically guarantees that pretty much
> nothing major will happen, will drag on for years and basically be
> a pain to manage because there will be lot of small changes all the
as long as the api change is documented and not mandatory
it's perfectly viable.
You know, I made a test bed with sane-evolution
for this and worked flawlessy, even retaining frontend
Tower Technologies - Torino, Italy
More information about the sane-devel