[sane-devel] [AVISION 6080E] Who is responsible for libsane.fdi?

Rene Rebe rene at exactcode.de
Fri May 22 14:18:19 UTC 2009


Actually I got in touch with git to other project using it (kernel,  
X, ...)
and I said upfront it's a little to hacky for me to get used to it. I  
prefer
a somewhat cleaner, more consistent interface (arguments and options)
such as mercurial, ... But well, I'll push the .desc update  ASAP.

On 22.05.2009, at 16:15, m. allan noah wrote:

> yes- git is taking me some time to get used to, but it is growing on  
> me :)
>
> allan
>
> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Rene Rebe <rene at exactcode.de> wrote:
>> Yeah, noticed.
>>
>> I'll have to try the new git  repository. Though one could copy the  
>> ID
>> to the .desc manually, but I'll really try to auto-update it timely.
>>
>> On 22.05.2009, at 16:05, m. allan noah wrote:
>>
>>> We'll have to ask Rene (cc'd) to update the .desc- the script is
>>> external to sane...
>>>
>>> allan
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:54 AM,  <emmanuel at engelhart.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> In
>>>> http://git.debian.org/?p=sane/sane-backends.git;a=blob;f=backend/avision.c;h=da5bcccd9d592505c2811648c054d05c10a8237f;hb=HEAD
>>>>
>>>> there is:
>>>>
>>>>  537     { NULL, NULL,
>>>>  538       0x0638, 0x0a82,
>>>>  539       "Avision", "FB6080E",
>>>>  540       AV_NON_INTERLACED_DUPLEX_300},
>>>>  541     /* comment="1 pass, 1200 dpi, A3 - duplex! - zero edge!"  
>>>> */
>>>>  542     /* status="complete" */
>>>>
>>>> So it's inside... and more pragmaticaly... it works by me :)
>>>>
>>>> Maybe someone has to run by hand a script to generate a new  
>>>> version of
>>>> avision.desc?
>>>>
>>>> Emmanuel
>>>>
>>>>  Le ven 22/05/09 15:49, "m. allan noah" kitno455 at gmail.com a écrit:
>>>>>
>>>>> I assume it is an oversight. The top of the file says it is  
>>>>> generated
>>>>> from avision.c, is the 6080 there?
>>>>>
>>>>> allan
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:44 AM,  <emmanu
>>>>> el at engelhart.org> wrote:
>>>>> Great, but the Avision 6080E is not there. Is that
>>>>> simply an oversight or there is another reason?
>>>>> Emmanuel
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Le ven 22/05/09 15:38, "m. allan noah" kitno455 at g
>>>>>
>>>>> mail.com a écrit:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> you are somehow looking at an old version, try
>>>>>
>>>>> this:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://git.debian.org/?p=sane/sane-backends.git;a=blob;f=doc/de
>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> scriptions/ 
>>>>> avision.desc;h=ae43758c1c8fd3a23fc34e2f366ee57e68b7d9e2;hb=HEAD
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> allan
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:29 AM,
>>>>>
>>>>>  <emmanu
>>>>>>
>>>>>> el at engelhart
>>>>>
>>>>> .org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you mean this .desc file:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://git.debian.org/?p=sane/sane-backends.git;a=blob_plain;f=
>>>>>
>>>>>>> backend/avision.desc
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ... but I see nothing about the vendor_id
>>>>>
>>>>> nor
>>>>>>
>>>>>> product_id.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The trunk code supports this scanner since
>>>>>
>>>>> Aug.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2008. See
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/2008-August
>>>>>
>>>>>>> /022673.html
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Emmanuel
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  Le ven 22/05/09 15:00, "m. allan noah"
>>>>>
>>>>> kitno455 at g
>>>>>>
>>>>>> mail.com a écrit:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> the fdi files are the bailiwick of the
>>>>>
>>>>> distro,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> but we give them the
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> raw materials to work from. If your machine
>>>>>
>>>>> is
>>>>>>
>>>>>> not listed in our .desc
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> files, the distro won't know
>>>>>
>>>>> about
>>>>>>
>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> allan
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 6:47
>>>>>
>>>>> AM,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  <emmanu
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> el at engelhart
>>>>>
>>>>>> .org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I have an Ubuntu Jaunty and I have
>>>>>
>>>>> reported
>>>>>>
>>>>>> two
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> times a problem with the
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> libsane.fdi:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> * https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hal/+bug/378401  
>>>>>>>> to the
>>>>>>>> sane-backends package
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/ 
>>>>>>> 28
>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 0909 to the HAL package
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> But I'm not sure to do it in
>>>>>
>>>>> the
>>>>>>
>>>>>> right
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> way.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The issue seems for me pretty easy
>>>>>
>>>>> to patch
>>>>>>
>>>>>> : the
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> scanner works currently only as root.
>>>>>
>>>>> The
>>>>>>
>>>>>> problem seems to come from
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> libsane.fdi because the AVISION 6080E in
>>>>>
>>>>> not
>>>>>>
>>>>>> inside. Patching it like
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> described in the bug report 280909 and
>>>>>
>>>>> it
>>>>>>
>>>>>> works.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So, do I do something
>>>>>
>>>>> wrong?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>> Emmanuel
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Unsubscribe: Send mail with
>>>>>
>>>>> subject
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "unsubscribe
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> your_password"
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>            to sane-devel-request at lists.alioth.debian.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> "The truth is an offense, but not
>>>>>
>>>>> a
>>>>>>
>>>>>> sin"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> "The truth is an offense, but not a
>>>>>
>>>>> sin"
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> "The truth is an offense, but not a sin"
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> "The truth is an offense, but not a sin"
>>
>> --
>>  René Rebe - ExactCODE GmbH - Europe, Germany, Berlin
>>  http://exactcode.de | http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.name
>>
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> "The truth is an offense, but not a sin"

-- 
   René Rebe - ExactCODE GmbH - Europe, Germany, Berlin
   http://exactcode.de | http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.name




More information about the sane-devel mailing list