[sane-devel] Mustek ScanExpress A3 USB 1200 PRO
scar at drigon.com
Fri Mar 26 18:07:56 UTC 2010
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Ille @ 03/26/2010 02:10 AM:
> Le Thu, 25 Mar 2010 23:39:17 -0700,
> scar <scar at drigon.com> a écrit :
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA256
>> scar @ 03/23/2010 12:34 PM:
>>> surely there is something we can learn from the linux packages
>>> mustek provides?
>> actually, i am surprised to find that these drivers actually work,
>> contrary to what i previously read! guess we should give mustek more
>> i ran a 'make uninstall' for the sane-backends that were currently
>> installed. now there was nothing sane* installed on my system. then
>> i ran 'sudo dpkg -i --force-architecture libsane_1.0.19-1_i386.deb'
>> followed by 'sudo scanimage > test.pnm' and indeed the test.pnm looks
>> just fine.
> So all you did was changing the Vendor- and ProductID, the y_ and
> x_range and the scanner struct, right?
i did not modify anything, nor could i since mustek just provides the
binaries. all i did was install mustek's driver, like anyone else might
have when they obtain a new piece of hardware. beforehand, i removed
the system's installation of libsane package.
>> now, if we could just get this to work with xsane in the meantime and
>> perhaps eventually packaged with sane-backends... or with ubuntu's
>> libsane package or whatever (if the licensing allows)...
> Doesn't it work with xsane?
when i try to install xsane, it wants to install libsane, which appears
that it might overwrite the drivers installed by mustek's package.
i think i will try my earlier suggestion of installing the official
libsane, xsane, etc. packages, then copy over the library files from
mustek's driver and see how it goes.
btw, isn't sane-backends licensed under GPL? how can mustek provide a
package without the source?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the sane-devel