[sane-devel] Canon Pixma MX435 Detection

[Louis Lagendijk]

On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 4:06 AM, Nicholas Elliott <nick at nick-elliott.net> wrote:
> 
> Hello Nicholas,
> 
> > I've installed xsane and the latest sane-backends:
> > scanimage -V
> > scanimage (sane-backends) 1.0.24git; backend version 1.0.22
> >
> > sane-find-scanner finds the scanner:
> > found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a9 [Canon], product=0x175b [MX430 series]) at
> > libusb:001:002
> >
> > scanimage -L does not find the scanner
> > No scanners were identified. If you were expecting something different,
> > check that the scanner is plugged in, turned on and detected by the
> > sane-find-scanner tool (if appropriate). Please read the documentation
> > which came with this software (README, FAQ, manpages).
> 
> Does the scanner get detected (and can you scan) if it is connected
> not by wireless, but via a physical USB cable?
> 
> > If I run scanimage in debug it finds my wireless network scanner but at the
> > end of its detection process it reports that no devices were found:
> > [sanei_debug] Setting debug level of pixma to 11.
> > [pixma] pixma is compiled with pthread support.
> > [pixma] pixma version 0.16.2
> > [pixma] sanei_bjnp_find_devices:
> > [pixma] Adding configured scanner: bjnp://192.168.1.76
> > [pixma] bjnp_allocate_device(bjnp://192.168.1.76)[pixma] udp_command:
> > Sending UDP command to 192.168.1.76:8612
> > [pixma] Scanner identity string = MFG:Canon;CMD:MultiPass 2.1,IVEC;MDL:MX430
> > series;CLS:IMAGE;DES:Canon MX430 series;SOJ:BJNP2,BJNPe;~
> > [pixma] Scanner model = Canon MX430 series
> > [pixma] Added all configured scanners, now do auto detection...
> > [pixma] lo is not a valid IPv4 interface, skipping...
> > [pixma] eth0 is not a valid IPv4 interface, skipping...
> > [pixma] eth1 is not a valid IPv4 interface, skipping...
> > [pixma] lo is not a valid IPv4 interface, skipping...
> > [pixma] eth0 is IPv4 capable, sending broadcast..
> > [pixma] lo is not a valid IPv4 interface, skipping...
> > [pixma] eth0 is not a valid IPv4 interface, skipping...
> > [pixma] lo is not a valid IPv4 interface, skipping...
> > [pixma] eth0 is not a valid IPv4 interface, skipping...
> > [pixma] eth1 is not a valid IPv4 interface, skipping...
> > [pixma] lo is not a valid IPv4 interface, skipping...
> > [pixma] eth0 is IPv4 capable, sending broadcast..
> > [pixma] lo is not a valid IPv4 interface, skipping...
> > [pixma] eth0 is not a valid IPv4 interface, skipping...
> > [pixma] lo is not a valid IPv4 interface, skipping...
> > [pixma] eth0 is not a valid IPv4 interface, skipping...
> > [pixma] eth1 is not a valid IPv4 interface, skipping...
> > [pixma] lo is not a valid IPv4 interface, skipping...
> > [pixma] eth0 is IPv4 capable, sending broadcast..
> > [pixma] lo is not a valid IPv4 interface, skipping...
> > [pixma] eth0 is not a valid IPv4 interface, skipping...
> > [pixma] lo is not a valid IPv4 interface, skipping...
> > [pixma] eth0 is not a valid IPv4 interface, skipping...
> > [pixma] eth1 is not a valid IPv4 interface, skipping...
> > [pixma] lo is not a valid IPv4 interface, skipping...
> > [pixma] eth0 is IPv4 capable, sending broadcast..
> > [pixma] lo is not a valid IPv4 interface, skipping...
> > [pixma] eth0 is not a valid IPv4 interface, skipping...
> > [pixma] lo is not a valid IPv4 interface, skipping...
> > [pixma] eth0 is not a valid IPv4 interface, skipping...
> > [pixma] eth1 is not a valid IPv4 interface, skipping...
> > [pixma] lo is not a valid IPv4 interface, skipping...
> > [pixma] eth0 is IPv4 capable, sending broadcast..
> > [pixma] lo is not a valid IPv4 interface, skipping...
> > [pixma] eth0 is not a valid IPv4 interface, skipping...
> > [pixma] scanner discovery finished...
> > [pixma] pixma_find_scanners() found 0 devices
> >
> > So, did it actually find my wireless network scanner and, if so, why does it
> > tell me that no devices were found?
> >
> > Is there something else I need to do or that you would like me to try?
> >
> > FYI Wireless scanning with Canon ScanGearMP works.
Should now be fixed. I just noticed that I forgot to push the change.
Please check again!
Kind regards, Louis