[sane-devel] State of the epjitsu backend for ScanSnap S1100/S1300i

Fri May 17 01:19:08 UTC 2013

I am sorry, I have done nothing further on this scanner. Frankly, this
driver is entirely reverse engineered, and it is a big undertaking to
add support for a new machine without any protocol docs. I'm not sure
when I will have the time.

allan

On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 10:30 AM, cabbii <cabbii+sane at halfabit.net> wrote:
> Does anyone know if there has been any headway on support for the S1300i? It
> looks like Peter has provided a wireshark capture here:
> http://sane.10972.n7.nabble.com/Fujitsu-ScanSnap-S1300i-tp17342.html
>
> Besides unlimited spare time, is there anything else that would help here?
>
>
> m. allan noah-3 wrote
>> Again, there is no reason to think that any version of the epjitsu
>> backend, patched or not, will work with the S1300i. We need logs of
>> the device being used under windows.
>>
>> allan
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Simon Matter <
>
>> simon.matter@
>
>> > wrote:
>>>> This is the first I have heard of the S1300i, so its not surprising it
>>>> does not work :)
>>>>
>>>> I have a partially completed merger of the S1100 code, but its pretty
>>>> broken now. I will finish it some day.
>>>
>>> I've tried it and got it to work with the S1100 but not with the S1300i.
>>> But you say it's pretty broken now and I'm unable to fix it.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hiroshi Miura has done a great deal of work on his own to merge this
>>>> driver, and he has a github repo with his branch. It does not contain
>>>> all the features of my S1100 patch. I probably should abandon my work
>>>> and use his merger instead.
>>>
>>> Well, I've tried it with sane-backends 1.0.22 and 1.0.23 and it segfaults
>>> for me :(
>>>
>>> Simon
>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/miurahr/sane-backends/commits/epjitsu-s1100
>>>>
>>>> allan
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Simon Matter <
>
>> simon.matter@
>
>> >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm trying to get two scanners to work for our mobile users. They are
>>>>> Fujitsu ScanSnap S1100 and S1300i.
>>>>>
>>>>> Since the S1300 is known to work like the S300 I was hoping the S1300i
>>>>> will also work. I've configured the USB id in epjitsu.conf to load
>>>>> Firmware 1300i_0D12.nal and it all seems well but once I start a scan I
>>>>> only get I/O errors. Here's the log from where it seems to fail:
>>>>>
>>>>> [epjitsu] read_from_scanner: start rB:24584 len:24584
>>>>> [epjitsu] do_cmd: start
>>>>> [epjitsu] in: memset 24584 bytes
>>>>> [epjitsu] in: reading 24584 bytes, timeout 10000
>>>>> [epjitsu] in: retVal 9
>>>>> [epjitsu] in: return error 'Error during device I/O'
>>>>> [epjitsu] read_from_scanner: error reading status = 9
>>>>> [epjitsu] read_from_scanner: finish rB:24576 len:0
>>>>> [epjitsu] coarsecal: cant read from scanner
>>>>> [epjitsu] sane_start: ERROR: failed to coarsecal
>>>>> [epjitsu] sane_cancel: start
>>>>> [epjitsu] sane_cancel: finish
>>>>> scanimage: sane_start: Error during device I/O
>>>>> [epjitsu] sane_cancel: start
>>>>> [epjitsu] sane_cancel: finish
>>>>> [epjitsu] sane_close: start
>>>>> [epjitsu] sane_cancel: start
>>>>> [epjitsu] sane_cancel: finish
>>>>> [epjitsu] lamp: start (0)
>>>>> [epjitsu] do_cmd: start
>>>>> [epjitsu] cmd: writing 2 bytes, timeout 10000
>>>>> [epjitsu] cmd: >>
>>>>> [epjitsu] 000: 1b d0
>>>>> [epjitsu] cmd: wrote 2 bytes, retVal 0
>>>>> [epjitsu] in: memset 1 bytes
>>>>> [epjitsu] in: reading 1 bytes, timeout 10000
>>>>> [epjitsu] in: retVal 0
>>>>> [epjitsu] in: read 1 bytes
>>>>> [epjitsu] in: <<
>>>>> [epjitsu] 000: 15
>>>>> [epjitsu] do_cmd: finish
>>>>>
>>>>> So my question is did anybody have luck with the S1300i and got it to
>>>>> work?
>>>>>
>>>>> The other question is about the S1100: I found the epjitsu-21.diff
>>>>> which
>>>>> seems promising. I saw nice things like the device names being set
>>>>> according to the name and serial number of the device. But, is it still
>>>>> the current version? Since it's said that it works with the S1100 but
>>>>> breaks the other devices, was there any progress made in the mean time?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Simon
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> sane-devel mailing list:
>
>> sane-devel at .debian
>
>>>>> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel
>>>>> Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password"
>>>>>              to
>
>> sane-devel-request at .debian
>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> "The truth is an offense, but not a sin"
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> "The truth is an offense, but not a sin"
>>
>> --
>> sane-devel mailing list:
>
>> sane-devel at .debian
>
>> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel
>> Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password"
>>              to
>
>> sane-devel-request at .debian
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://sane.10972.n7.nabble.com/State-of-the-epjitsu-backend-for-ScanSnap-S1100-S1300i-tp16840p17559.html
> Sent from the SANE - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> --
> sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel
> Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password"
>              to sane-devel-request at lists.alioth.debian.org

-- 
"The truth is an offense, but not a sin"