[sane-devel] Canon MF8200C Series
Troels Thomsen
troels.pil.thomsen at gmail.com
Fri Nov 7 10:21:35 UTC 2014
Hi,
Update:
Everything I can thing of works fine through ethernet also!
:-)
Another corner-case:
Button controlled scan is not supported in the windows-driver, and does not
work in XSane either.
Is there a 'capabilities' protocol from XSane to the backend, such that if
we mark 'button controlled scan' as not supported on this device, the XSane
gui does not show this checkbox?
Or we could just error the scan, if we get this request?
Just a thought ...
/Troels
2014-11-07 10:55 GMT+01:00 Troels Thomsen <troels.pil.thomsen at gmail.com>:
>
> MF8230 Scanner-driver is really good now through USB. (I'll test with
> ethernet another day.)
>
> I've found two corner-cases.
>
> 1)
> When choosing 3 copies from ADF in XSane, but putting 4 copies in the
> scanner (!) :
> - 3 pages are scanned correctly
> - All 4 pages goes through the ADF, and printer is waiting for something.
> - After 30 sec or so, it breaks with a beep and prints "error occured" in
> the display.
> No other intervention is required (you *can* break it on the scanner gui)
> - and scanner is not in bad-mode as we previously experienced.
> So I'm OK with this.
>
>
> 2)
> In xsane, if you choose two copies , from Flatbed (!) the scanner really
> scans twice at 300 dpi.
> At 600 dpi (and e.g. 75 dpi) it ends with EBUSY, see below, and a pop-up
> in XSane.
>
> Personally I'm OK with this, I don't know if we should do anything.
> I don't know if this is a valid use-case. If not - it could also be
> subject to input parameter validation in XSane or sane-backend.
> How does this work on other scanners?
>
> <cut>
> [pixma] IN T=723.027 len=14
> [pixma] 00000000:06 06 03 01 00 41 03 00 41 10 00 01 00 66
> [pixma]
> [pixma] Current status: paper=1 cal=0 lamp=16
> [pixma] Current status: paper=1 cal=0 lamp=16
> [pixma] *iclass_finish_scan***** abort session *****
> [pixma] OUT T=723.027 len=10
> [pixma] 00000000:ef 20 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> [pixma]
> [pixma] IN T=723.037 len=2
> [pixma] 00000000:06 06
> [pixma]
> [pixma] pixma_read_image():completed
> [pixma] Reader task terminated
>
> (this is all perfectly normal - now the next scan starts)
>
> [pixma] Reader task started
> [pixma]
> [pixma] pixma_scan(): start
> [pixma] line_size=15360 image_size=107765760 channels=3 depth=8
> [pixma] dpi=600x600 offset=(0,0) dimension=5120x7016
> [pixma] [pixma] Reader task id=-1249522880 (threaded)
> gamma_table=0x95d087c source=0
> [pixma] threshold=127 threshold_curve=0
> [pixma] ADF page count: 0
> [pixma] Setting non-blocking mode
> [pixma] raw_width = 5120
> [pixma] OUT T=723.910 len=10
> [pixma] 00000000:f3 20 00 00 00 00 00 00 0c 00
> [pixma]
> [pixma] IN T=723.917 len=14
> [pixma] 00000000:06 06 03 01 00 41 03 00 41 10 00 01 00 66
> [pixma]
> [pixma] Current status: paper=1 cal=0 lamp=16
> [pixma] Current status: paper=1 cal=0 lamp=16
> [pixma] *iclass_scan***** start scanning *****
> [pixma] OUT T=723.917 len=10
> [pixma] 00000000:db 20 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> [pixma]
> [pixma] IN T=723.927 len=2
> [pixma] 00000000:14 14
> [pixma]
> [pixma] pixma_scan() failed EBUSY
> [pixma] Reader task terminated: EBUSY
> [pixma] read_image():reader task closed the pipe:0 bytes received,
> 107765760 bytes expected
> [pixma] pixma_close(): Canon i-SENSYS MF8200C Series
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 2014-11-07 9:54 GMT+01:00 Troels Thomsen <troels.pil.thomsen at gmail.com>:
>
>>
>> Sorry for the delay.
>> It turns out, that the MF8230 has max resolution 300dpi from ADF and 600
>> dpi from Platen Glass, see attached screenshots.
>> So there is no work here - except possibly to error this condition and
>> abort operation.
>>
>> I'll check again to see, if everything else seems to be working. I think
>> it does.
>>
>> /Troels
>>
>>
>>
>> See attached
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 2014-09-17 9:15 GMT+02:00 Rolf Bensch <rolf at bensch-online.de>:
>>
>>> Hi Troels,
>>>
>>> For my understanding: Can you do multiple scanimage scans without
>>> power-cycling the device between two single scans?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Rolf
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 11.09.2014 um 22:52 schrieb Troels Thomsen:
>>> >
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > Attached is log of two pages scanned with adf at 600 dbp. Device is
>>> > freshly power-cycled before this trace.
>>> > Xsane hangs until I break it with Ctrl+C in the terminal.
>>> > From the look of the logfile, it seems like no real image data is
>>> > transmitted. Only the
>>> > OUT T=60.552 len=11
>>> > [pixma] 00000000:d4 60 00 00 00 00 00 00 04 00 06
>>> > [pixma]
>>> > [pixma] IN T=60.569 len=8
>>> > [pixma] 00000000:06 06 00 00 00 00 00 00
>>> > sequence is seen.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Also attached is the xsane log for scanning with flatbed at 600 dpi.
>>> > Data is shown in window in xsane, but an error-box is displayed, and
>>> > logfile seems to end with a EBUSY.
>>> >
>>> > Oddly, imho, scanimage just ends like this:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > [pixma]
>>> > [pixma] IN T=17.647 len=7680
>>> > [pixma] 00000000:ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
>>> > [pixma] 00000010:ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
>>> > [pixma] 00000020:ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
>>> > [pixma] 00000030:ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
>>> > [pixma] 00000040:ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
>>> > [pixma] 00000050:ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
>>> > [pixma] 00000060:ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
>>> > [pixma] 00000070:ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
>>> > [pixma] ...
>>> > [pixma]
>>> > [pixma] IN T=17.647 len=8
>>> > [pixma] 00000000:f1 f0 ee f1 ed ee eb e3
>>> > [pixma]
>>> > [pixma] OUT T=17.647 len=11
>>> > [pixma] 00000000:d4 60 00 00 00 00 00 00 04 00 06
>>> > [pixma]
>>> > [pixma] IN T=17.656 len=8
>>> > [pixma] 00000000:06 06 28 00 00 00 00 00
>>> > [pixma]
>>> > [pixma] OUT T=17.678 len=10
>>> > [pixma] 00000000:f3 20 00 00 00 00 00 00 0c 00
>>> > [pixma]
>>> > [pixma] IN T=17.688 len=14
>>> > [pixma] 00000000:06 06 03 01 00 41 03 00 41 10 00 01 00 66
>>> > [pixma]
>>> > [pixma] Current status: paper=1 cal=0 lamp=16
>>> > [pixma] Current status: paper=1 cal=0 lamp=16
>>> > [pixma] OUT T=17.688 len=10
>>> > [pixma] 00000000:f3 20 00 00 00 00 00 00 0c 00
>>> > [pixma]
>>> > [pixma] IN T=17.696 len=14
>>> > [pixma] 00000000:06 06 03 01 00 41 03 00 41 10 00 01 00 66
>>> > [pixma]
>>> > [pixma] Current status: paper=1 cal=0 lamp=16
>>> > [pixma] Current status: paper=1 cal=0 lamp=16
>>> > [pixma] *iclass_finish_scan***** abort session *****
>>> > [pixma] OUT T=17.696 len=10
>>> > [pixma] 00000000:ef 20 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
>>> > [pixma]
>>> > [pixma] IN T=17.706 len=2
>>> > [pixma] 00000000:06 06
>>> > [pixma]
>>> > [pixma] pixma_read_image():completed
>>> > [pixma] Reader task terminated
>>> > [pixma] pixma_close(): Canon i-SENSYS MF8200C Series
>>> >
>>> > I.e. NO error when using scanimage, but EBUSY when using XSane !?!?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > /Troels
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > 2014-09-11 19:18 GMT+02:00 Rolf Bensch <rolf at bensch-online.de
>>> > <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de>>:
>>> >
>>> > Hi Troels,
>>> >
>>> > Am 09.09.2014 um 23:11 schrieb Troels Thomsen:
>>> > > Hi Rolf
>>> > >
>>> > > patch new1 seems to work!
>>> > >
>>> > > regarding ADF its mixed:
>>> > > At 150 dpi it scans pages, but colors are a bit psycedelic.
>>> Bacground
>>> > > should be white.
>>> >
>>> > You need to do some gamma settings. It's easier to use xsane here.
>>> >
>>> > > At 600 dpi it fails, and scanner hangs.
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> > It seems that your scanner doesn't finish the scan correctly @ any
>>> > resolution. I saw an unsupported paper status.
>>> >
>>> > Please restart your scanner and test 600 dpi directly. And please
>>> try a
>>> > multi page ADF scan after you repowered your scanner.
>>> >
>>> > Please send new log files. Then I'll patch this next weekend.
>>> >
>>> > Cheers,
>>> > Rolf
>>> >
>>> > > /Troels
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > 2014-09-03 21:15 GMT+02:00 Rolf Bensch <rolf at bensch-online.de
>>> <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de>
>>> > > <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de>>>:
>>> > >
>>> > > Hi Troels,
>>> > >
>>> > > OK, based on recent git code I prepared a new patch.
>>> > >
>>> > > With this patch I revert last patch2 and try to fix scan end
>>> detection.
>>> > >
>>> > > If this patch is working for flatbed, please test ADF
>>> scanning.
>>> > >
>>> > > Please send me a log file from ADF scanning, whatever it's
>>> running or
>>> > > not. If ADF gets stuck, please send me an ADF log file from
>>> windows.
>>> > >
>>> > > Cheers,
>>> > > Rolf
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Am 31.08.2014 <tel:31.08.2014> <tel:31.08.2014
>>> > <tel:31.08.2014>> um 09:31 schrieb Troels Thomsen:
>>> > > >
>>> > > > I have done a lot of testing with scan areas of 5 by 5
>>> milimeters, and
>>> > > > that gives a false picture of what works and what does
>>> not. (slightly
>>> > > > different behaviour on BJNP and USB)
>>> > > > Sorry
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Let's go back to usb and scanning large areas:
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Patch 1 (usb vid/pid) works, but scanner hangs in
>>> "scanning".
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Patch 2 (generation 1), makes scanning fail as seen in
>>> logfile of
>>> > > > previous post.
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > I've tested with git revision of ~ 1 august , and of
>>> today, and picture
>>> > > > is the same. Patch 2 makes it fail.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Could it be that it's not a classic generation 1 or
>>> generation 2, but a
>>> > > > mix somehow?
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > /Troels
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > 2014-08-30 12:55 GMT+02:00 Rolf Bensch <
>>> rolf at bensch-online.de <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de>
>>> > <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de>>
>>> > > > <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de <mailto:
>>> rolf at bensch-online.de>
>>> > <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de>>>>:
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Hi Troels,
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Am 30.08.2014 <tel:30.08.2014> <tel:30.08.2014
>>> > <tel:30.08.2014>> <tel:30.08.2014 <tel:30.08.2014>
>>> > > <tel:30.08.2014 <tel:30.08.2014>>> um 06:44 schrieb Troels
>>> > Thomsen:
>>> > > > > It seems that there is a problem with mf8230 usb
>>> scanning.
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > I'm pretty sure I did the testing with the patches I
>>> got,
>>> > > but now
>>> > > > when I
>>> > > > > pull from git, it fails.
>>> > > > > Was anything added/changed recently in pixma backend,
>>> > that could
>>> > > > > influence mf8230?
>>> > > >
>>> > > > I did a smarter implementation for setting the
>>> generation
>>> > > version = 1.
>>> > > > But it's working, as you can see in the log file.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Are you sure that you disconnected the LAN interface
>>> while
>>> > > testing USB?
>>> > > > And can you scan via LAN only?
>>> > > >
>>> > > > If this doesn't help, please go back to the debugged
>>> Sane
>>> > > version and
>>> > > > patch the files again. Please send me a working log
>>> file.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Cheers,
>>> > > > Rolf
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20141107/4a6bd59b/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: win_xp_adf.png
Type: image/png
Size: 25551 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20141107/4a6bd59b/attachment-0002.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: win_xp_platen_glass.png
Type: image/png
Size: 25108 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20141107/4a6bd59b/attachment-0003.png>
More information about the sane-devel
mailing list